Literature DB >> 14967419

A multinational, randomized phase III trial of iseganan HCl oral solution for reducing the severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving radiotherapy for head-and-neck malignancy.

Andy Trotti1, Adam Garden, Padraig Warde, Paul Symonds, Corey Langer, Rebecca Redman, Thomas F Pajak, Tomas R Fleming, Michael Henke, Jean Bourhis, David I Rosenthal, Elizabeth Junor, Anthony Cmelak, Finbarr Sheehan, Janis Pulliam, Patricia Devitt-Risse, Henry Fuchs, Mark Chambers, Brian O'Sullivan, K Kian Ang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis (OM) causes significant morbidity during the course of radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head-and-neck cancer. It is hypothesized that infection plays a role in the development of OM. We tested the efficacy of iseganan HCl (iseganan), a synthetic peptide with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, for preventing RT-associated OM.
METHODS: A multinational, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was performed on patients receiving primary RT, primary chemoradiotherapy or postoperative RT. Patients were randomized to receive iseganan oral solution plus standard-of-care oral hygiene (SOC), placebo plus SOC, or SOC alone throughout the RT administration period. The severity of OM was assessed by NCI-CTC scoring and clinical symptoms by patient questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 545 patients were randomized to the study. Nine percent of the patients in both the iseganan and placebo groups did not develop ulcerative OM (Grades 2, 3, 4) (p = 0.998) whereas only 2% of the patients receiving SOC alone remained free of oral ulceration (p = 0.049). The maximum severity of mouth pain and difficulty swallowing did not differ in patients treated with iseganan or placebo. However, patients in both intervention groups reported less mouth pain and difficulty swallowing than did patients receiving SOC alone. Nausea was the only adverse event that occurred with >/=5% increased frequency in the iseganan group than in either the placebo or SOC groups (51% vs. 42% vs. 46%). Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation and death did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSION: Iseganan oral solution was safe but did not reduce the risk for developing ulcerative OM relative to placebo. Intensified oral hygiene or the administration of the vehicle used to deliver study drug in this trial appears to have reduced the risk and severity of OM. Our results suggest that antimicrobial intervention may not meaningfully affect the pathogenesis of radiation-induced OM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14967419     DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01627-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  38 in total

Review 1.  Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function.

Authors:  Christopher D Fjell; Jan A Hiss; Robert E W Hancock; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Peptide antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Håvard Jenssen; Pamela Hamill; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 4.  The effectiveness of mouthwashes in alleviating radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Masaru Konishi; Rinus Gerardus Verdonschot; Kiichi Shimabukuro; Takashi Nakamoto; Minoru Fujita; Naoya Kakimoto
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Rediscovery of antimicrobial peptides as therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Minkyung Ryu; Jaeyeong Park; Ji-Hyun Yeom; Minju Joo; Kangseok Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Membrane interactions and pore formation by the antimicrobial peptide protegrin.

Authors:  Themis Lazaridis; Yi He; Lidia Prieto
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Acyl-substituted dermaseptin S4 derivatives with improved bactericidal properties, including on oral microflora.

Authors:  Y Porat; K Marynka; A Tam; D Steinberg; A Mor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Antimicrobial peptides and induced membrane curvature: geometry, coordination chemistry, and molecular engineering.

Authors:  Nathan W Schmidt; Gerard C L Wong
Journal:  Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.354

9.  Topical delivery of low-cost protein drug candidates made in chloroplasts for biofilm disruption and uptake by oral epithelial cells.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Aditya C Kamesh; Yuhong Xiao; Victor Sun; Michael Hayes; Henry Daniell; Hyun Koo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Synthetic molecular evolution of host cell-compatible, antimicrobial peptides effective against drug-resistant, biofilm-forming bacteria.

Authors:  Charles G Starr; Jenisha Ghimire; Shantanu Guha; Joseph P Hoffmann; Yihui Wang; Leisheng Sun; Brooke N Landreneau; Zachary D Kolansky; Isabella M Kilanowski-Doroh; Mimi C Sammarco; Lisa A Morici; William C Wimley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.