BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of the 6-minute walk test in stable outpatients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the association of 6-minute walk test distance and outcomes among 541 patients enrolled in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Patients were grouped by total distance (< or =200 m, 201 m-300 m, 301 m-400 m, and >400 m) with median follow-up of 32 months. All-cause mortality for patients who walked < or =200 m was significantly higher than patients who walked >200 m (43.9% versus 23.3%, P<0.001), but mortality was comparable among patients who walked >200 m (201 m-300 m: 23.7%, 301 m-400 m: 25.2%, >400 m 19.8%, P for trend 0.45). Results were similar for death due to worsening heart failure (< or =200 m: 29.3%, 201 m-300 m: 7.6%, 301 m-400 m: 6.7%, >400 m: 6.1%, P for trend <0.001). In multivariable analysis, distance < or =200 m remained associated with increased mortality (< or =200 m: hazard ratio (HR) 1.47, 95% CI 0.96-2.27; >200 m: HR 1.00, Referent; P=0.07) and death due to worsening heart failure (< or =200 m: HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.54-5.41; >200 m: 1.00, Referent; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 6-minute walk test identifies patients who walk less than 200 m as being at markedly increased risk of death. Changing the 6-minute walk test to a time- and distance-based standard would improve the efficiency of the test while retaining the bulk of the prognostic information.
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of the 6-minute walk test in stable outpatients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the association of 6-minute walk test distance and outcomes among 541 patients enrolled in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Patients were grouped by total distance (< or =200 m, 201 m-300 m, 301 m-400 m, and >400 m) with median follow-up of 32 months. All-cause mortality for patients who walked < or =200 m was significantly higher than patients who walked >200 m (43.9% versus 23.3%, P<0.001), but mortality was comparable among patients who walked >200 m (201 m-300 m: 23.7%, 301 m-400 m: 25.2%, >400 m 19.8%, P for trend 0.45). Results were similar for death due to worsening heart failure (< or =200 m: 29.3%, 201 m-300 m: 7.6%, 301 m-400 m: 6.7%, >400 m: 6.1%, P for trend <0.001). In multivariable analysis, distance < or =200 m remained associated with increased mortality (< or =200 m: hazard ratio (HR) 1.47, 95% CI 0.96-2.27; >200 m: HR 1.00, Referent; P=0.07) and death due to worsening heart failure (< or =200 m: HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.54-5.41; >200 m: 1.00, Referent; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 6-minute walk test identifies patients who walk less than 200 m as being at markedly increased risk of death. Changing the 6-minute walk test to a time- and distance-based standard would improve the efficiency of the test while retaining the bulk of the prognostic information.
Authors: Robert J Mentz; Vera Bittner; Phillip J Schulte; Jerome L Fleg; Ileana L Piña; Steven J Keteyian; Gordon Moe; Anil Nigam; Ann M Swank; Anekwe E Onwuanyi; Meredith Fitz-Gerald; Andrew Kao; Stephen J Ellis; William E Kraus; David J Whellan; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Stephen J Bartels; Sarah I Pratt; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Laura K Barre; John A Naslund; Rosemarie Wolfe; Haiyi Xie; Gregory J McHugo; Daniel E Jimenez; Ken Jue; James Feldman; Bruce L Bird Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Scott L Hummel; Wahida Karmally; Brenda W Gillespie; Stephen Helmke; Sergio Teruya; Joanna Wells; Erika Trumble; Omar Jimenez; Cara Marolt; Jeffrey D Wessler; Maria L Cornellier; Mathew S Maurer Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Stephen J Bartels; Sarah I Pratt; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Laura K Barre; Kenneth Jue; Rosemarie S Wolfe; Haiyi Xie; Gregory McHugo; Meghan Santos; Gail E Williams; John A Naslund; Kim T Mueser Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Robert J Mentz; Phillip J Schulte; Jerome L Fleg; Mona Fiuzat; William E Kraus; Ileana L Piña; Steven J Keteyian; Dalane W Kitzman; David J Whellan; Stephen J Ellis; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jennifer L Black-Shinn; Gregory L Kinney; Anastasia L Wise; Elizabeth A Regan; Barry Make; Mori J Krantz; R Graham Barr; James R Murphy; David Lynch; Edwin K Silverman; James D Crapo; John E Hokanson Journal: COPD Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 2.409