OBJECTIVE: To increase the positive and mitigate the negative health impacts of the mayor's draft transport strategy for London. DESIGN: A rapid prospective health impact assessment (HIA) of the penultimate draft of the strategy, using a review commissioned by the regional director of public health; an appraisal of congestion charging; and a participatory workshop. Two audits of changes were performed to assess the impact on policy of the HIA process. SETTING: Regional government policy development. INTERVENTION: Recommendations from the rapid HIA were fed back into the drafting process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes (a) between the penultimate draft and the draft for public consultation and (b) between that and the final mayoral strategy. RESULTS: The draft transport strategy published for consultation differed in a number of respects from the previous version. Almost all the recommendations from the HIA were incorporated into the final strategy. Significant changes included promoting sustainable travel plans for workplaces and schools; giving priority to infrastructure and services that benefit London's deprived communities; increased emphasis on promoting walking and cycling and reducing reliance on private cars; and a commitment to track the health impacts of the final strategy and its implementation. Specific additions included re-allocating road space. CONCLUSION: HIA was successful in influencing the transport strategy for London, resulting in several improvements from a health viewpoint. HIA is an effective method both for bringing about significant change in policy proposals and in increasing policy makers' understanding of determinants of health and hence in changing attitudes of policy makers.
OBJECTIVE: To increase the positive and mitigate the negative health impacts of the mayor's draft transport strategy for London. DESIGN: A rapid prospective health impact assessment (HIA) of the penultimate draft of the strategy, using a review commissioned by the regional director of public health; an appraisal of congestion charging; and a participatory workshop. Two audits of changes were performed to assess the impact on policy of the HIA process. SETTING: Regional government policy development. INTERVENTION: Recommendations from the rapid HIA were fed back into the drafting process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes (a) between the penultimate draft and the draft for public consultation and (b) between that and the final mayoral strategy. RESULTS: The draft transport strategy published for consultation differed in a number of respects from the previous version. Almost all the recommendations from the HIA were incorporated into the final strategy. Significant changes included promoting sustainable travel plans for workplaces and schools; giving priority to infrastructure and services that benefit London's deprived communities; increased emphasis on promoting walking and cycling and reducing reliance on private cars; and a commitment to track the health impacts of the final strategy and its implementation. Specific additions included re-allocating road space. CONCLUSION: HIA was successful in influencing the transport strategy for London, resulting in several improvements from a health viewpoint. HIA is an effective method both for bringing about significant change in policy proposals and in increasing policy makers' understanding of determinants of health and hence in changing attitudes of policy makers.
Authors: Scott Burris; Alexander C Wagenaar; Jeffrey Swanson; Jennifer K Ibrahim; Jennifer Wood; Michelle M Mello Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Andrew L Dannenberg; Rajiv Bhatia; Brian L Cole; Carlos Dora; Jonathan E Fielding; Katherine Kraft; Diane McClymont-Peace; Jennifer Mindell; Chinwe Onyekere; James A Roberts; Catherine L Ross; Candace D Rutt; Alex Scott-Samuel; Hugh H Tilson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Phil Symonds; James Milner; Nahid Mohajeri; Juliette Aplin; Joanna Hale; Simon J Lloyd; Henry Fremont; Sam Younkin; Clive Shrubsole; Lawrie Robertson; Jonathon Taylor; Nici Zimmermann; Paul Wilkinson; Mike Davies Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2021-05-18
Authors: Stefanie Uibel; Cristian Scutaru; Daniel Mueller; Doris Klingelhoefer; Diana My Linh Hoang; Masaya Takemura; Axel Fischer; Michael F Spallek; Volker Unger; David Quarcoo; David A Groneberg Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Francesco Chini; Sara Farchi; Ivana Ciaramella; Tranquillo Antoniozzi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Laura Camilloni; Massimo Valenti; Piero Borgia Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 3.918