OBJECTIVE: To evaluate N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for systolic heart failure in the general population. DESIGN: Study participants, randomly selected to be representative of the background population, filled in a heart failure questionnaire and underwent pulse and blood pressure measurements, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and blood sampling and were followed up for a median (range) period of 805 (60-1171) days. SETTING: Participants were recruited from four randomly selected general practitioners and were examined in a Copenhagen university hospital. PATIENTS: 382 women and 290 men in four age groups (50-59 (n = 174); 60-69 (n = 204); 70-79 (n = 174); > or = 80 years (n = 120)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Value of NT-proBNP in evaluating patients with symptoms of heart failure and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function; prognostic value of NT-proBNP for mortality and hospital admissions. RESULTS: In 38 (5.6%) participants LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was < or = 40%. NT-proBNP identified patients with symptoms of heart failure and LVEF < or = 40% with a sensitivity of 0.92, a specificity of 0.86, positive and negative predictive values of 0.11 and 1.00, and area under the curve of 0.94. NT-proBNP was the strongest independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.70, p < 0.0001), hospital admissions for heart failure (HR = 13.83, p < 0.0001), and other cardiac admissions (HR = 3.69, p < 0.0001). Mortality (26 v 6, p = 0.0003), heart failure admissions (18 v 2, p = 0.0002), and admissions for other cardiac causes (44 v 13, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with NT-proBNP above the study median (32.5 pmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of NT-proBNP may be useful as a screening tool for systolic heart failure in the general population.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for systolic heart failure in the general population. DESIGN: Study participants, randomly selected to be representative of the background population, filled in a heart failure questionnaire and underwent pulse and blood pressure measurements, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and blood sampling and were followed up for a median (range) period of 805 (60-1171) days. SETTING:Participants were recruited from four randomly selected general practitioners and were examined in a Copenhagen university hospital. PATIENTS: 382 women and 290 men in four age groups (50-59 (n = 174); 60-69 (n = 204); 70-79 (n = 174); > or = 80 years (n = 120)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Value of NT-proBNP in evaluating patients with symptoms of heart failure and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function; prognostic value of NT-proBNP for mortality and hospital admissions. RESULTS: In 38 (5.6%) participants LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was < or = 40%. NT-proBNP identified patients with symptoms of heart failure and LVEF < or = 40% with a sensitivity of 0.92, a specificity of 0.86, positive and negative predictive values of 0.11 and 1.00, and area under the curve of 0.94. NT-proBNP was the strongest independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.70, p < 0.0001), hospital admissions for heart failure (HR = 13.83, p < 0.0001), and other cardiac admissions (HR = 3.69, p < 0.0001). Mortality (26 v 6, p = 0.0003), heart failure admissions (18 v 2, p = 0.0002), and admissions for other cardiac causes (44 v 13, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with NT-proBNP above the study median (32.5 pmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of NT-proBNP may be useful as a screening tool for systolic heart failure in the general population.
Authors: A M Richards; M G Nicholls; T G Yandle; C Frampton; E A Espiner; J G Turner; R C Buttimore; J G Lainchbury; J M Elliott; H Ikram; I G Crozier; D W Smyth Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-05-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: A M Richards; R Doughty; M G Nicholls; S MacMahon; N Sharpe; J Murphy; E A Espiner; C Frampton; T G Yandle Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alain G Bertoni; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Dalane W Kitzman; Santica M Marcovina; Julia T Rushing; Mark A Espeland Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Claire Sweeney; Fiona Ryan; Mark Ledwidge; Cristin Ryan; Ken McDonald; Chris Watson; Rebabonye B Pharithi; Joe Gallagher Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-10-15
Authors: Lisa C Costello-Boerrigter; Guido Boerrigter; Margaret M Redfield; Richard J Rodeheffer; Lynn H Urban; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Denise M Heublein; John C Burnett Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John Gierula; Richard M Cubbon; Maria F Paton; Rowenna Byrom; Judith E Lowry; Sarah F Winsor; Melanie McGinlay; Emma Sunley; Emma Pickles; Lorraine C Kearney; Aaron Koshy; Thomas A Slater; Hemant K Chumun; Haqeel A Jamil; Kristian M Bailey; Julian H Barth; Mark T Kearney; Klaus K Witte Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Lori B Daniels; Gail A Laughlin; Paul Clopton; Alan S Maisel; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 24.094