Literature DB >> 14965988

Variation in the ratio of shoot silhouette area to needle area in fertilized and unfertilized Norway spruce trees.

P Stenberg1, S Linder, H Smolander.   

Abstract

We compared the range and variation in shoot silhouette area to projected leaf area ratio (SPAR) in fertilized and unfertilized (control) Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) trees. We measured SPAR for several view directions of 169 shoots at different depths in the crown of fertilized and control trees. There was an increase in SPAR with depth in the crown in both control and fertilized trees. In the fertilized trees, however, mean SPAR was larger overall, the increase with depth in the crown was steeper, and there was a larger variation in SPAR with inclination and rotation angle of the shoot (relative to the view direction). In particular, shoots in the lower crown of fertilized trees were rotationally asymmetrical ("flat") and had high values of the maximum ratio of shoot silhouette area to projected leaf area (SPAR(max)). Differences in SPAR between fertilized and control trees were explained by changes in shoot structure in response to fertilization and shading. Shoots of fertilized trees were larger and had more needle area than shoots of control trees. However, the ratio of needle area to shoot size was smaller in fertilized trees than in control trees, implying less within-shoot shading and, consequently, a larger SPAR. Also, the increase in SPAR with increased shading (depth in the crown) could be explained by a decrease in the ratio of needle area to shoot size. In addition, because fertilized trees had more needle area than control trees, the effect of shading at a given depth in the crown was more pronounced in fertilized trees than in control trees.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 14965988     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/15.11.705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  2 in total

1.  Verification of our empirical understanding of the physiology and ecology of two contrasting plantation species using a trait database.

Authors:  Yoko Osone; Shoji Hashimoto; Tanaka Kenzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The impact of tree canopy structure on understory variation in a boreal forest.

Authors:  Titta Majasalmi; Miina Rautiainen
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.558

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.