Literature DB >> 14965955

Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin.

B E Haynes1, S T Gower.   

Abstract

We estimated carbon allocation to belowground processes in unfertilized and fertilized red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) plantations in northern Wisconsin to determine how soil fertility affects belowground allocation patterns. We used soil CO(2) efflux and litterfall measurements to estimate total belowground carbon allocation (root production and root respiration) by the carbon balance method, established root-free trenched plots to examine treatment effects on microbial respiration, estimated fine root production by sequential coring, and developed allometric equations to estimate coarse root production. Fine root production ranged from 150 to 284 g m(-2) year(-1) and was significantly lower for fertilized plots than for unfertilized plots. Coarse root production ranged from 60 to 90 g m(-2) year(-1) and was significantly lower for fertilized plots than for unfertilized plots. Annual soil CO(2) fluxes ranged from 331 to 541 g C m(-2) year(-1) and were significantly lower for fertilized plots than for unfertilized plots. Annual foliage litterfall ranged from 110 to 187 g C m(-2) year(-1) and was significantly greater for fertilized plots than for unfertilized plots. Total belowground carbon allocation ranged from 188 to 395 g C m(-2) year(-1) and was significantly lower for fertilized than for unfertilized plots. Annual soil CO(2) flux was lower for trenched plots than for untrenched plots but did not differ between fertilized and unfertilized trenched plots. Collectively, these independent estimates suggest that fertilization decreased the relative allocation of carbon belowground.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 14965955     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/15.5.317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  8 in total

1.  Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?

Authors:  Joseph Levillain; Armel Thongo M'Bou; Philippe Deleporte; Laurent Saint-André; Christophe Jourdan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Enabling Breeding Selection for Biomass in Slash Pine Using UAV-Based Imaging.

Authors:  Zhaoying Song; Federico Tomasetto; Xiaoyun Niu; Wei Qi Yan; Jingmin Jiang; Yanjie Li
Journal:  Plant Phenomics       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Carbon balance of a tropical savanna of northern Australia.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Chen; Lindsay B Hutley; Derek Eamus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Interactions among plants, bacteria, and fungi reduce extracellular enzyme activities under long-term N fertilization.

Authors:  Joseph E Carrara; Christopher A Walter; Jennifer S Hawkins; William T Peterjohn; Colin Averill; Edward R Brzostek
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Root morphology and architecture respond to N addition in Pinus tabuliformis, west China.

Authors:  Guoliang Wang; Timothy J Fahey; Sha Xue; Fang Liu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Responses of fine roots and soil N availability to short-term nitrogen fertilization in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in northeastern China.

Authors:  Cunguo Wang; Shijie Han; Yumei Zhou; Caifeng Yan; Xubing Cheng; Xingbo Zheng; Mai-He Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Do elevations in temperature, CO2, and nutrient availability modify belowground carbon gain and root morphology in artificially defoliated silver birch seedlings?

Authors:  Liisa Huttunen; Karita Saravesi; Annamari Markkola; Pekka Niemelä
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Divergent Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Soil Respiration in a Semiarid Grassland.

Authors:  Cheng Zhu; Yiping Ma; Honghui Wu; Tao Sun; Kimberly J La Pierre; Zewei Sun; Qiang Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.