Literature DB >> 14965359

DNA repair and cancer: lessons from mutant mouse models.

Takatoshi Ishikawa1, Samuel S-M Zhang, Xiusheng Qin, Yoshihisa Takahashi, Hideaki Oda, Yoko Nakatsuru, Fumio Ide.   

Abstract

DNA damage, if the repair process, especially nucleotide excision repair (NER), is compromised or the lesion is repaired by some other error-prone mechanism, causes mutation and ultimately contributes to neoplastic transformation. Impairment of components of the DNA damage response pathway (e.g., p53) is also implicated in carcinogenesis. We currently have considerable knowledge of the role of DNA repair genes as tumor suppressors, both clinically and experimentally. The deleterious clinical consequences of inherited defects in DNA repair system are apparent from several human cancer predisposition syndromes (e.g., NER-compromised xeroderma pigmentosum [XP] and p53-deficient Li-Fraumeni syndrome). However, experimental studies to support the clinical evidence are hampered by the lack of powerful animal models. Here, we review in vivo experimental data suggesting the protective function of DNA repair machinery in chemical carcinogenesis. We specifically focus on the three DNA repair genes, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene (MGMT ), XP group A gene (XPA) and p53. First, mice overexpressing MGMT display substantial resistance to nitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. In addition, a reduction of spontaneous liver tumors and longer survival times were evident. However, there are no known mutations in the human MGMT and therefore no associated cancer syndrome. Secondly, XPA mutant mice are indeed prone to spontaneous and carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in internal organs (which are not exposed to sunlight). The concomitant loss of p53 resulted in accelerated onset of carcinogenesis. Finally, p53 null mice are predisposed to brain tumors upon transplacental exposure to a carcinogen. Accumulated evidence in these three mutant mouse models firmly supports the notion that the DNA repair system is vital for protection against cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14965359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03190.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  16 in total

1.  An endogenous DNA adduct as a prognostic biomarker for hepatocarcinogenesis and its prevention by Theaphenon E in mice.

Authors:  Ying Fu; Shana Silverstein; Justine N McCutcheon; Marcin Dyba; Raghu G Nath; Monika Aggarwal; Heidi Coia; Angela Bai; Jishen Pan; Jiji Jiang; Bhaskar Kallakury; Hongkun Wang; Yu-Wen Zhang; Giuseppe Giaccone; Aiwu Ruth He; Fung-Lung Chung
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Response of human mammary epithelial cells to DNA damage induced by 4-hydroxyequilenin: Lack of p53-mediated G1 arrest.

Authors:  Muriel Cuendet; Judy L Bolton
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.192

3.  Benzo[a]pyrene (BP) DNA adduct formation in DNA repair-deficient p53 haploinsufficient [Xpa(-/-)p53(+/-)] and wild-type mice fed BP and BP plus chlorophyllin for 28 days.

Authors:  Kaarthik John; M Margaret Pratt; Frederick A Beland; Mona I Churchwell; Gail McMullen; Ofelia A Olivero; Igor P Pogribny; Miriam C Poirier
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Modeling Dose-response at Low Dose: A Systems Biology Approach for Ionization Radiation.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; Paolo F Ricci
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Knockdown of Gli1 by small-interfering RNA enhances the effects of BCNU on the proliferation and apoptosis of glioma U251 cells.

Authors:  Wenjia Guo; Hailong Tian; Xiaogang Dong; Jinping Bai; Xinling Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

6.  Variation in PAH-related DNA adduct levels among non-smokers: the role of multiple genetic polymorphisms and nucleotide excision repair phenotype.

Authors:  Arash Etemadi; Farhad Islami; David H Phillips; Roger Godschalk; Asieh Golozar; Farin Kamangar; Akbar Fazel-Tabar Malekshah; Akram Pourshams; Seerat Elahi; Farhad Ghojaghi; Paul T Strickland; Philip R Taylor; Paolo Boffetta; Christian C Abnet; Sanford M Dawsey; Reza Malekzadeh; Frederik J van Schooten
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  High expression of ERCC5 predicts a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xueyong Zheng; Ke Chen; Xiaolong Liu; Guangyi Jiang; Hui Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-07-01

8.  Susceptibility of XPD and hOGG1 genetic variants to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Zhou; Li-Ping Xie; Yi-Wei Lin; Kai Yang; Qi-Qi Mao; Yue Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2013-05-30

9.  N -ethyl- N -nitrosourea induces retinal photoreceptor damage in adult rats.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Yoshizawa; Tomo Sasaki; Norihisa Uehara; Maki Kuro; Ayako Kimura; Yuichi Kinoshita; Hisanori Miki; Takashi Yuri; Airo Tsubura
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.628

10.  Genetic variation and its role in malignancy.

Authors:  Bente A Talseth-Palmer; Rodney J Scott
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.