Literature DB >> 14965186

Bicycle shock absorption systems and energy expended by the cyclist.

Henri Nielens1, Thierry Lejeune.   

Abstract

Bicycle suspension systems have been designed to improve bicycle comfort and handling by dissipating terrain-induced energy. However, they may also dissipate the cyclist's energy through small oscillatory movements, often termed 'bobbing', that are generated by the pedalling movements. This phenomenon is a major concern for competitive cyclists engaged in events where most of the time is spent climbing, e.g. off-road cross-country races. An acceptable method to assess the overall efficacy of suspension systems would be to evaluate energy consumed by cyclists using different types of suspension systems. It could be assumed that any system that reduces metabolic expenditure for the cyclist would automatically lead to performance improvement. Unfortunately, only a limited number of studies have been conducted on that subject. Moreover, the conclusions that can be drawn from most of them are limited due to unsatisfactory statistical power, experimental protocols, measuring techniques and equipment. This review presents and discusses the most relevant results of studies that focused on mechanical simulations as well as on energy expenditure in relation to off-road bicycle suspension systems. Evidence in the literature suggests that cyclist-generated power that is dissipated by suspensions is minimal and probably negligible on most terrains. However, the scarce studies on the topic as well as the limitations in the conclusions that can be drawn from most of them indicate that we should remain cautious before supporting the use of dual suspension bicycles on all course types and for all cyclists. For example, it should be kept in mind that most cross-country racers still use front suspension bicycles. This might be explained by excessive cyclist-generated power dissipation at the high mechanical powers developed by elite cross-country cyclists that have not been studied in the literature. Finally, suspended bicycles are more comfortable. Moreover, the fact that suspension systems may significantly reduce physical stress should not be overlooked, especially in very long events and for recreational cyclists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14965186     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200434020-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  6 in total

1.  Effects of front and dual suspension mountain bike systems on uphill cycling performance.

Authors:  K J Hise; P J Allen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Energy cost of riding bicycles with shock absorption systems on a flat surface.

Authors:  H Nielens; T M Lejeune
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Experimental optimization of pivot point height for swing-arm type rear suspensions in off-road bicycles.

Authors:  Ari Karchin; M L Hull
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Asymmetry in bicycle ergometer pedalling.

Authors:  D J Daly; P R Cavanagh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1976

5.  The effects of mountain bike suspension systems on energy expenditure, physical exertion, and time trial performance during mountain bicycling.

Authors:  J G Seifert; M J Luetkemeier; M K Spencer; D Miller; E R Burke
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  A dynamic system model of an off-road cyclist.

Authors:  E L Wang; M L Hull
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.097

  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  The physiology of mountain biking.

Authors:  Franco M Impellizzeri; Samuele M Marcora
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Current Perspectives of Cross-Country Mountain Biking: Physiological and Mechanical Aspects, Evolution of Bikes, Accidents and Injuries.

Authors:  Rhaí André Arriel; Hiago L R Souza; Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Moacir Marocolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Sex and age-related differences in performance in a 24-hour ultra-cycling draft-legal event - a cross-sectional data analysis.

Authors:  Lara Pozzi; Beat Knechtle; Patrizia Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann; Romuald Lepers; Christoph Alexander Rüst
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-05-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.