OBJECTIVE: To review states' Medicaid drug utilization (DUR) annual reports for federal fiscal year (FFY) 1999 to assess the usefulness of the information provided in assisting states in improving their DUR programs. DATA SOURCES: Medicaid DUR annual reports from 43 states and the District of Columbia. DATA EXTRACTION: Five DUR experts conducted in-depth reviews of the annual reports to determine whether states provided the information required by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA; now the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) annual report instructions, to assess the usefulness of information provided by states to other states seeking to improve their programs, and to consider what changes in report content are needed to increase the value of the reports. DATA SYNTHESIS: States provided the information requested by HCFA, but such information was not particularly useful in helping other states improve their programs, nor was it easily available to other states. These reports need to be reoriented. Rather than instruments useful for compliance monitoring, the reports should be remade as tools useful for educating DUR program staff. To do this, changes in report content are needed, and individual states should have access to reports from all states. Specific recommendations made based on these findings would be important first steps in improving the effectiveness of DUR programs. CONCLUSION: Much room for improvement remains in the content and distribution of Medicaid DUR annual reports. Finding ways to improve the effectiveness of DUR is especially important as the nation moves to implement a Medicare prescription drug benefit.
OBJECTIVE: To review states' Medicaid drug utilization (DUR) annual reports for federal fiscal year (FFY) 1999 to assess the usefulness of the information provided in assisting states in improving their DUR programs. DATA SOURCES: Medicaid DUR annual reports from 43 states and the District of Columbia. DATA EXTRACTION: Five DUR experts conducted in-depth reviews of the annual reports to determine whether states provided the information required by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA; now the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) annual report instructions, to assess the usefulness of information provided by states to other states seeking to improve their programs, and to consider what changes in report content are needed to increase the value of the reports. DATA SYNTHESIS: States provided the information requested by HCFA, but such information was not particularly useful in helping other states improve their programs, nor was it easily available to other states. These reports need to be reoriented. Rather than instruments useful for compliance monitoring, the reports should be remade as tools useful for educating DUR program staff. To do this, changes in report content are needed, and individual states should have access to reports from all states. Specific recommendations made based on these findings would be important first steps in improving the effectiveness of DUR programs. CONCLUSION: Much room for improvement remains in the content and distribution of Medicaid DUR annual reports. Finding ways to improve the effectiveness of DUR is especially important as the nation moves to implement a Medicare prescription drug benefit.