Literature DB >> 14964502

Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects.

Joseph J Knapik1, Katy L Reynolds, Everett Harman.   

Abstract

This study reviews historical and biomedical aspects of soldier load carriage. Before the 18th century, foot soldiers seldom carried more than 15 kg while on the march, but loads have progressively risen since then. This load increase is presumably due to the weight of weapons and equipment that incorporate new technologies to increase protection, firepower, communications, and mobility. Research shows that locating the load center of mass as close as possible to the body center of mass results in the lowest energy cost and tends to keep the body in an upright position similar to unloaded walking. Loads carried on other parts of the body result in higher energy expenditures: each kilogram added to the foot increases energy expenditure 7% to 10%; each kilogram added to the thigh increases energy expenditure 4%. Hip belts on rucksacks should be used whenever possible as they reduce pressure on the shoulders and increase comfort. Low or mid-back load placement might be preferable on uneven terrain but high load placement may be best for even terrain. In some tactical situations, combat load carts can be used, and these can considerably reduce energy expenditure and improve performance. Physical training that includes aerobic exercise, resistance training targeted at specific muscle groups, and regular road marching can considerably improve road marching speed and efficiency. The energy cost of walking with backpack loads increases progressively with increases in weight carried, body mass, walking speed, or grade; type of terrain also influences energy cost. Predictive equations have been developed, but these may not be accurate for prolonged load carriage. Common injuries associated with prolonged load carriage include foot blisters, stress fractures, back strains, metatarsalgia, rucksack palsy, and knee pain. Load carriage can be facilitated by lightening loads, improving load distribution, optimizing load-carriage equipment, and taking preventive action to reduce the incidence of injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14964502     DOI: 10.7205/milmed.169.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  73 in total

1.  A fractionation of the physiological burden of the personal protective equipment worn by firefighters.

Authors:  Nigel A S Taylor; Michael C Lewis; Sean R Notley; Gregory E Peoples
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effect of operational stressors on ibuprofen pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Cathy Boscarino; Andrea N Edginton; Henry Peng; K Wayne Riggs; András Szeitz; Bob Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The effects of heavy load carriage on physiological responses to graded exercise.

Authors:  D B Phillips; M K Stickland; I A Lesser; S R Petersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Dietary nitrate reduces the O2 cost of desert marching but elevates the rise in core temperature.

Authors:  Matthew Kuennen; Lisa Jansen; Trevor Gillum; Jorge Granados; Weston Castillo; Ahmad Nabiyar; Kevin Christmas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effects of thoracic load carriage on maximal ambulatory work tolerance and acceptable work durations.

Authors:  Gregory E Peoples; Daniel S Lee; Sean R Notley; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effects of extra load position on energy expenditure in treadmill running.

Authors:  Arve Vorland Pedersen; Rasmus Stokke; Asgeir Mamen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Diagnoses and factors associated with medical evacuation and return to duty among nonmilitary personnel participating in military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Charlie Brown; Connie Kurihara; Anthony Plunkett; Conner Nguyen; Scott A Strassels
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Limitations imposed by wearing armour on Medieval soldiers' locomotor performance.

Authors:  Graham N Askew; Federico Formenti; Alberto E Minetti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Physiological Employment Standards III: physiological challenges and consequences encountered during international military deployments.

Authors:  Bradley C Nindl; John W Castellani; Bradley J Warr; Marilyn A Sharp; Paul C Henning; Barry A Spiering; Dennis E Scofield
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Physical fitness as a risk factor for injuries and excessive stress symptoms during basic military training.

Authors:  Lisa Müller-Schilling; Nils Gundlach; Irina Böckelmann; Stefan Sammito
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.