Literature DB >> 14964326

Evaluating the benefit of speech recoding hearing aids in children.

Denise R Miller-Hansen1, Peggy B Nelson, Judith E Widen, Stephen D Simon.   

Abstract

Children with significant high-frequency hearing loss may be difficult to fit with hearing aids using conventional amplification. Frequency-lowering hearing aids using dynamic speech recoding (DSR) technology have been proposed as a possible means to achieve full speech audibility. The current study investigated 78 children from ages 1.3 to 21.6 years (M = 10.6 years) who wore DSR hearing aids. These hearing aids provided significant improvements in pure-tone average (PTA; mean improvement for the aided versus unaided condition of 49 dB) and high-frequency PTA (mean improvement for the aided versus unaided condition of 56 dB). A subgroup of 19 children were previous users of conventional hearing aids. These participants demonstrated a mean improvement of 11 dB in PTA and 12.5% in word recognition scores for DSR versus conventional amplification. However, DSR hearing aids required repair 3 times as often as conventional hearing aids. The greatest benefit was observed in children whose word recognition scores were poorest using conventional hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14964326     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2003/018)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  8 in total

1.  A historical perspective on digital hearing AIDS: how digital technology has changed modern hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

Review 2.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Novel nucleotide changes in mutational analysis of mitochondrial 12SrRNA gene in patients with nonsyndromic and aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Dowlati; Pupak Derakhshandeh-Peykar; Massoud Houshmand; Mohammad Farhadi; Azadeh Shojaei; Masoomeh Fallah; Esmaiil Mohammadi; Ardavan Tajdini; Shima Arastoo; Javad Tavakkoly-Bazzaz
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

Review 5.  An evidence-based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Rebecca A Venediktov; Jaumeiko J Coleman; Hillary M Leech
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Evaluation of a Frequency-Lowering Algorithm for Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Comparison of Frequency Transposition and Frequency Compression for People With Extensive Dead Regions in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.