BACKGROUND: In peptic ulcer bleeding, the sensitivity of H. pylori tests, in particular of the rapid urease test (RUT), has been reported to be insufficient. AIM: To validate the RUT, serology and the urea breath test were carried out in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, and to study the influence of H. pylori suppressive treatment (HpSuT), i. e., antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 123 consecutive patients (mean age 65.5 years) with a relevant bleeding from gastric or duodenal ulcers were prospectively tested for H. pylori infection by directs tests (RUT, histology, culture, urea breath test) and by IgG serology as an indirect test. Positive H. pylori status was defined by positive histology or culture. RESULTS: In patients without HpSuT during the preceding four weeks (N = 83), the sensitivity and specificity of RUT was 94 and 84 %, that of serology 83 and 68 % respectively. The sensitivity of urea breath test decreased from 82 to 60 % after even one day of HpSuT. In the overall group, the duration of HpSuT and preceding hospitalization were independent factors linked with negative results of all direct tests. CONCLUSIONS: In peptic ulcer bleeding, RUT combined with histology is an adequate diagnostic approach. However, false negative results have to be considered following even short-term HpSuT or hospitalization. Non-invasive diagnosis based on serology alone is inaccurate and should be complemented by the urea breath test prior to starting HpSuT.
BACKGROUND: In peptic ulcer bleeding, the sensitivity of H. pylori tests, in particular of the rapid urease test (RUT), has been reported to be insufficient. AIM: To validate the RUT, serology and the urea breath test were carried out in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, and to study the influence of H. pylori suppressive treatment (HpSuT), i. e., antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 123 consecutive patients (mean age 65.5 years) with a relevant bleeding from gastric or duodenal ulcers were prospectively tested for H. pyloriinfection by directs tests (RUT, histology, culture, urea breath test) and by IgG serology as an indirect test. Positive H. pylori status was defined by positive histology or culture. RESULTS: In patients without HpSuT during the preceding four weeks (N = 83), the sensitivity and specificity of RUT was 94 and 84 %, that of serology 83 and 68 % respectively. The sensitivity of urea breath test decreased from 82 to 60 % after even one day of HpSuT. In the overall group, the duration of HpSuT and preceding hospitalization were independent factors linked with negative results of all direct tests. CONCLUSIONS: In peptic ulcer bleeding, RUT combined with histology is an adequate diagnostic approach. However, false negative results have to be considered following even short-term HpSuT or hospitalization. Non-invasive diagnosis based on serology alone is inaccurate and should be complemented by the urea breath test prior to starting HpSuT.