Literature DB >> 14963052

Calcium intake during pregnancy among white and African-American pregnant women in the United States.

Emily W Harville1, Margaret Schramm, Margaret Watt-Morse, Kim Chantala, John J B Anderson, Irva Hertz-Picciotto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the calcium intake in a racially mixed cohort of pregnant women, including the contribution of supplementation and antacids.
METHODS: A cohort of women was interviewed twice during their pregnancies. The interviews included a food frequency questionnaire and questions on calcium supplementation and antacid intake. Pregnant women seeking prenatal care at a Pittsburgh hospital in the first trimester were enrolled. 454 women were enrolled and did not miscarry; 385 completed two interviews and were of white or African-American race.
RESULTS: Mean and median intakes of calcium were 1671 mg/day and 1482 mg/day. 36% of the women were under the former RDA level (1200 mg/day) for calcium, while 26% were under the current AI (1000 mg/day). Six percent were taking in less than 600 mg/day, and 15% over 2500 mg/day, the tolerable upper limit. Young women were particularly likely to have low intakes (12% of those less than 21 years of age had less than 600 mg/day). Black women were slightly overrepresented among those with low intake (8% vs. 5% of whites), but, overall, their intake was quite similar to whites. Milk and cheese provided more calcium than other food items. Many women took antacids, especially during the second half of pregnancy, and these were a major source of calcium for some members of the cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Although mean and median calcium intake in the cohort were above the AI, many women had calcium intakes that were too high or low. Dairy products provided the most calcium for most pregnant women, and antacids were an important source for many.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14963052     DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2004.10719341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr        ISSN: 0731-5724            Impact factor:   3.169


  7 in total

1.  Community income, smoking, and birth weight disparities in Wisconsin.

Authors:  Mario Sims; Tammy Harris Sims; Marino A Bruce
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2007-12

2.  Household Food Insecurity Is Not Associated with Overall Diet Quality Among Pregnant Women in NHANES 1999-2008.

Authors:  Ryan Gamba; Cindy W Leung; Sylvia Guendelman; Maureen Lahiff; Barbara A Laraia
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

3.  Micronutrient Intake Is Inadequate for a Sample of Pregnant African-American Women.

Authors:  Susan W Groth; Patricia A Stewart; Deborah J Ossip; Robert C Block; Nellie Wixom; I Diana Fernandez
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Bone mineral density measurement in puerperal women as a predictor of persistent osteopenia.

Authors:  Takumi Kurabayashi; Hiroshi Nagata; Nozomi Takeyama; Hiroshi Matsushita; Kenichi Tanaka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Vascular and cellular calcium in normal and hypertensive pregnancy.

Authors:  Zuzana Adamova; Sifa Ozkan; Raouf A Khalil
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-01

6.  Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study.

Authors:  Barbara A Cromer; Andrea E Bonny; Margaret Stager; Rina Lazebnik; Ellen Rome; Julie Ziegler; Kelly Camlin-Shingler; Michelle Secic
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The Current Recommended Vitamin D Intake Guideline for Diet and Supplements During Pregnancy Is Not Adequate to Achieve Vitamin D Sufficiency for Most Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Fariba Aghajafari; Catherine J Field; Bonnie J Kaplan; Doreen M Rabi; Jack A Maggiore; Maeve O'Beirne; David A Hanley; Misha Eliasziw; Deborah Dewey; Amy Weinberg; Sue J Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.