Literature DB >> 14962980

Control elements within the PWS/AS imprinting box and their function in the imprinting process.

Boris Kantor1, Kirill Makedonski, Yael Green-Finberg, Ruth Shemer, Aharon Razin.   

Abstract

A cluster of imprinted genes on human chromosome 15q11-q13 (the PWS/AS domain) and its ortholog on mouse chromosome 7c is believed to be regulated by an imprinting control center. Although minideletions in this region in Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients revealed that two elements, shortest deletion regions of overlap in AS families and PWS families (AS-SRO and PWS-SRO), respectively, constitute the IC, the molecular mechanism that governs this regional control remains obscure. To understand how this imprinting center works, a mouse model was sought. The striking similarity between the human and mouse sequences allowed the generation of a minitransgene (AS-SMP) composed of AS-SRO and the Snrpn minimal promoter (SMP) the mouse ortholog of PWS-SRO. This minitransgene carries out, in a highly reliable and reproducible manner, all steps of the imprinting process. In an attempt to decipher the molecular mechanism of the imprinting process, we generated and tested for imprinting five minitransgenes based on AS-SMP, in which various parts of the 160 bp SMP were deleted. These experiments revealed a set of five cis elements that carry out the various steps of the imprinting process. This set includes: (i). two copies of a de novo methylation signal (DNS) that establish the maternal imprint during oogenesis; (ii). an allele discrimination signal that establishes the paternal imprint; and (iii). two elements that act together to maintain the paternal imprint. Two functionally redundant sets of the five elements were found on the respective endogenous mouse sequence explaining the previously published contradictory results of targeted deletion experiments. Together with the fact that all five elements bind specific proteins that are presumably the factors acting in trans in the imprinting process, our observations set the stage for a comprehensive study of the molecular mechanism involved in the control of the imprinting process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14962980     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  21 in total

1.  Rasgrf1 imprinting is regulated by a CTCF-dependent methylation-sensitive enhancer blocker.

Authors:  Bongjune Yoon; Herry Herman; Benjamin Hu; Yoon Jung Park; Anders Lindroth; Adam Bell; Adam G West; Yanjie Chang; Aimee Stablewski; Jessica C Piel; Dmitri I Loukinov; Victor V Lobanenkov; Paul D Soloway
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Timing and sequence requirements defined for embryonic maintenance of imprinted DNA methylation at Rasgrf1.

Authors:  Rebecca Holmes; Yanjie Chang; Paul D Soloway
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  New insights into establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation imprints in mammals.

Authors:  Gavin Kelsey; Robert Feil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Successful computational prediction of novel imprinted genes from epigenomic features.

Authors:  Chelsea M Brideau; Kirsten E Eilertson; James A Hagarman; Carlos D Bustamante; Paul D Soloway
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Analysis of candidate imprinted genes in PWS subjects with atypical genetics: a possible inactivating mutation in the SNURF/SNRPN minimal promoter.

Authors:  Esther N Maina; Tessa Webb; Sarita Soni; Joyce Whittington; Harm Boer; David Clarke; Anthony Holland
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Ube3a-ATS is an atypical RNA polymerase II transcript that represses the paternal expression of Ube3a.

Authors:  Linyan Meng; Richard E Person; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Narrowed abrogation of the Angelman syndrome critical interval on human chromosome 15 does not interfere with epigenotype maintenance in somatic cells.

Authors:  Masayuki Haruta; Makiko Meguro; Yu-Ki Sakamoto; Hidetoshi Hoshiya; Akiko Kashiwagi; Yasuhiko Kaneko; Kohzoh Mitsuya; Mitsuo Oshimura
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis of subjects with chromosome 15 abnormalities.

Authors:  Douglas C Bittel; Nataliya Kibiryeva; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007

9.  Regulation of the large (approximately 1000 kb) imprinted murine Ube3a antisense transcript by alternative exons upstream of Snurf/Snrpn.

Authors:  Miguel Landers; Daria L Bancescu; Elodie Le Meur; Claire Rougeulle; Heather Glatt-Deeley; Camilynn Brannan; Françoise Muscatelli; Marc Lalande
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Protein-binding elements establish in the oocyte the primary imprint of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes domain.

Authors:  Yotam Kaufman; Maya Heled; Jonathan Perk; Aharon Razin; Ruth Shemer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.