Literature DB >> 14962560

Osteoblast response to PLGA tissue engineering scaffolds with PEO modified surface chemistries and demonstration of patterned cell response.

Wendy S Koegler1, Linda G Griffith.   

Abstract

Because tissues are characterized by a well-defined three-dimensional arrangement of cells, tissue engineering scaffolds that facilitate the organization and differentiation of new tissue will have improved performance in comparison to scaffolds that only provide surfaces for cell attachment and growth. We hypothesize that instructions for cells can be incorporated into tissue engineering scaffolds by patterning the scaffold's architecture and surface chemistry. Our goals for the presented work were to collect data about cell response to three-dimensional, porous scaffolds with uniformly modified surfaces chemistries, and to demonstrate patterning of cell response by patterning surface chemistry. Our system was osteoblast response to poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds modified with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). Scaffolds were fabricated using the Three-Dimensional Printing (3DP) process which has control over scaffolds properties to a resolution of approximately 100 microm in all three dimensions. At higher PEO concentrations, adhesion, growth rates, and migration of rat osteoblasts were reduced; alkaline phosphate activity was increased, and cells were less spread and had microvilli. Patterned regions of low and high cell adhesion were demonstrated on scaffolds fabricated with 1 mm thick stripes of PEO and non-PEO regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14962560     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  7 in total

Review 1.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Method to analyze three-dimensional cell distribution and infiltration in degradable scaffolds.

Authors:  Paul Thevenot; Ashwin Nair; Jagannath Dey; Jian Yang; Liping Tang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Additive manufacturing of biomaterials.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Dongxu Ke; Himanshu Sahasrabudhe; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Prog Mater Sci       Date:  2017-08-26

4.  Controlling the degradation kinetics of porous iron by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) infiltration for use as temporary medical implants.

Authors:  Abdul Hakim Md Yusop; Nurizzati Mohd Daud; Hadi Nur; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Hendra Hermawan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A comparative evaluation of the effect of polymer chemistry and fiber orientation on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  David C L Rowland; Thomas Aquilina; Andrei Klein; Osnat Hakimi; Pierre Alexis-Mouthuy; Andrew J Carr; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Comparative studies on osteogenic potential of micro- and nanofibre scaffolds prepared by electrospinning of poly(ε-caprolactone).

Authors:  Ting-Ting Li; Katrin Ebert; Jürgen Vogel; Thomas Groth
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2013-11-14

7.  Effect of Cross-Linking Density on the Structures and Properties of Carbodiimide-Treated Gelatin Matrices as Limbal Stem Cell Niches.

Authors:  Jui-Yang Lai; Li-Jyuan Luo; David Hui-Kang Ma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.