Literature DB >> 14962247

Optimizing donor selection in a cord blood bank.

Pilar Solves1, Alfredo Perales, Vicente Mirabet, Ignacio Blasco, Amando Blanquer, D Planelles, Luis Larrea, Javier Monleon, F Carbonell-Uberos, M Angeles Soler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main limitation factor for the wide use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) as a source of hematopoietic progenitor for transplantation is cell dose. One of the specific areas identified by some studies for improvement of UCB collection is donor selection.
METHODS: Over a 3-mth period, 391 consecutive maternal-neonatal pairs were evaluated during the pre-partum period in the maternity ward at La Fe University Hospital (Valencia) by the Cord Blood Bank staff. Reasons for discarding umbilical cord blood donors and collected UCB units at the Cord Blood Bank in Valencia have been analysed. Obstetric factors influencing TNC content of 1300 collected UCB units have been determined, in order to establish obstetric criteria for cord blood donors selection in our geographic area.
RESULTS: Only 32.5% of potential cord blood donors were refused. Among 1300 UCB collected, 506 (38.9%) were discarded before cryopreservation, mainly due to low cell counts. Multivariate analyses showed that the main significant factors influencing nucleated cell count were the weight of the placenta, sex of newborn and mode of collection.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that maternal medical histories must be completely reviewed by medical staff before collection of the UCB. Obstetrical factors influence cell content of UCB and could be added to standard cord blood donor criteria in order to improve the bank efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14962247     DOI: 10.1046/j.0902-4441.2003.00187.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

1.  Umbilical cord blood processing using Prepacyte-CB increases haematopoietic progenitor cell availability over conventional Hetastarch separation.

Authors:  C Basford; N Forraz; S Habibollah; K Hanger; C P McGuckin
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Effects of obstetric factors and storage temperatures on the yield of endothelial colony forming cells from umbilical cord blood.

Authors:  Kate E Coldwell; Stephanie J Lee; Jennifer Kean; Cheen P Khoo; Grigorios Tsaknakis; Jon Smythe; Suzanne M Watt
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 9.596

3.  Cord blood collection and banking from a population with highly diverse geographic origins increase HLA diversity in the registry and do not lower the proportion of validated cord blood units: experience of the Marseille Cord Blood Bank.

Authors:  C Bordoni; J Magalon; C Gilbertas; M Gamerre; P Le Coz; M Berthomieu; C Chabannon; J Di Cristofaro; C Picard
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Ethical challenges of cord blood banks: a scoping review.

Authors:  Madjid Soltani Gerdfaramarzi; Shabnam Bazmi; Mehrzad Kiani; Leila Afshar; Mohsen Fadavi; Seyed Ali Enjoo
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-06

Review 5.  Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: Collection up to transplantation.

Authors:  Seyed Hadi Mousavi; Morteza Zarrabi; Saeid Abroun; Mona Ahmadipanah; Bahareh Abbaspanah
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2019-12-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.