OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) in myomatous uteri larger than 24 week's gestation (780 cm3). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. SETTING: Universitas Hospital, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. POPULATION: Sixty-one women, who underwent UAE, were included in the study. The study group comprised of 12 women with uteri > or =780 cm3 and the control group 49 women with uteri <780 cm3. METHODS: UAE was performed and the difference in outcome for the two groups was determined at 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Symptomatic improvement with embolisation of the large uterus. RESULTS: Reduction of dysmenorrhoea, menorrhagia and pressure effects was similar for both groups. The median reduction in uterine volume (pre- to post-embolisation) was 188 cm3 (range 28-2038 cm3) with a 95% CI for the median difference for paired data of 146.5 and 236. Only 66% of the study group had, however, a reduction in volume to <780 cm3. The complication rates were similar for the two groups with regards to post-embolisation syndrome, fibroid slough, haematoma formation, infection, hysterectomy and failure to embolise. Satisfaction was similar between the two groups, with 91% of women satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSION: The large uterus does not decrease UAE's efficacy. Although 33.3% of the study group still had a uterus of > or =780 cm3, symptom reduction was still similar for both groups. Women may thus still be left with a large uterine volume but without symptoms. This must be taken into consideration when counselling women with an extremely large uterus for UAE.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) in myomatous uteri larger than 24 week's gestation (780 cm3). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. SETTING: Universitas Hospital, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. POPULATION: Sixty-one women, who underwent UAE, were included in the study. The study group comprised of 12 women with uteri > or =780 cm3 and the control group 49 women with uteri <780 cm3. METHODS: UAE was performed and the difference in outcome for the two groups was determined at 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Symptomatic improvement with embolisation of the large uterus. RESULTS: Reduction of dysmenorrhoea, menorrhagia and pressure effects was similar for both groups. The median reduction in uterine volume (pre- to post-embolisation) was 188 cm3 (range 28-2038 cm3) with a 95% CI for the median difference for paired data of 146.5 and 236. Only 66% of the study group had, however, a reduction in volume to <780 cm3. The complication rates were similar for the two groups with regards to post-embolisation syndrome, fibroid slough, haematoma formation, infection, hysterectomy and failure to embolise. Satisfaction was similar between the two groups, with 91% of women satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSION: The large uterus does not decrease UAE's efficacy. Although 33.3% of the study group still had a uterus of > or =780 cm3, symptom reduction was still similar for both groups. Women may thus still be left with a large uterine volume but without symptoms. This must be taken into consideration when counselling women with an extremely large uterus for UAE.
Authors: Albert J Smeets; Robbert J Nijenhuis; Willem Jan van Rooij; Emilie A M Weimar; Peter F Boekkooi; Leo E H Lampmann; Harry A M Vervest; Paul N M Lohle Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Eduardo Zlotnik; Marcos de Lorenzo Messina; Felipe Nasser; Breno Boueri Affonso; Ronaldo Hueb Baroni; Nelson Wolosker; Edmund Chada Baracat Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.365