Literature DB >> 14961777

Measuring information strategies in oncology - developing an information satisfaction questionnaire.

R Thomas1, E Kaminski, E Stanton, M Williams.   

Abstract

The benefits of providing accurate and culturally sensitive information for patients are now undisputable and information strategies are generally being adopted nationally. Measuring their benefits and adapting strategies to local needs is now a new challenge. Although questionnaires to measure global satisfaction are available, no concise tool has previously existed to specifically measure the information aspects of care. The aims of this study are: to establish which aspects of information were most important to the patients during their cancer pathway; to develop a robust single-page questionnaire that is sensitive to patient priorities to measure and compare satisfaction between patient groups; and to audit information provision within routine clinical practice. Seventy-seven consecutive patients were asked to complete a priority list of which aspects of information were most important to them during their recent cancer care. A total of 303 answers were categorized into five final categories of equal weighting. The data were combined with demographic issues to produce a robust one-page questionnaire which has been adopted formally by the West Anglia Cancer Network. One hundred consecutive patients were then audited to highlight the information shortcomings of a busy community oncology department and the findings are reforming information services. We recommend the use of this practical audit tool in routine clinical practice, which can be downloaded free from cancernet.co.uk in seven languages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14961777     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2004.00445.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  12 in total

Review 1.  Reluctance to disclose difficult diagnoses: a narrative review comparing communication by psychiatrists and oncologists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Ana Manterola; Berta Hernández; Fernando Arias de la Vega; Maite Martínez; Meritxell Vila; Clara Eito; Ruth Vera; Miguel Ángel Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  The breast cancer patient navigation kit: development and user feedback.

Authors:  Myriam Skrutkowski; Andréanne Saucier; Sarkis Meterissian
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The influence of life stage on supportive care and information needs in cancer patients: does older age matter?

Authors:  Maggie Watson; Sue Davolls; Kabir Mohammed; Sarah Shepherd
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Cancer patient assessment and reports of excellence: reliability and validity of advanced cancer patient perceptions of the quality of care.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Julie C Lima; Kathleen Doyle Lyons
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Validity and reliability testing of two instruments to measure breast cancer patients' concerns and information needs relating to radiation therapy.

Authors:  Georgia K B Halkett; Linda J Kristjanson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-11-25       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Lymphoma InterVEntion (LIVE) - patient-reported outcome feedback and a web-based self-management intervention for patients with lymphoma: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lindy P J Arts; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Sanne W van den Berg; Judith B Prins; Olga Husson; Floortje Mols; Angelique V M Brands-Nijenhuis; Lidwine Tick; Simone Oerlemans
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Minh Hao Nguyen; Ellen Ma Smets; Nadine Bol; Eugène F Loos; Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven; Debby Geijsen; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kristien Maj Tytgat; Julia Cm van Weert
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher G Lis; Mark Rodeghier; Digant Gupta
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Pilot Testing and Preliminary Psychometric Validation of the Polish Translation of the EORTC INFO25 Questionnaire: Validation of the Polish version of INFO25-pilot study.

Authors:  Mirosława Püsküllüoğlu; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Aneta L Zygulska; Sebastian Ochenduszko; Joanna Streb; Iwona M Tomaszewska; Krzysztof Krzemieniecki
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2013-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.