Literature DB >> 14961170

Low-dose warfarin in atrial fibrillation leads to more thromboembolic events without reducing major bleeding when compared to adjusted-dose--a meta-analysis.

Christine Perret-Guillaume1, Denis G Wahl.   

Abstract

The use of warfarin with a range INR of 2.0-3.0 is recommended in prevention of stroke for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, in particular those older than 75 years. The risk of bleeding that is associated with this range of INR has led to evaluate lower ranges (low-dose or fixed minidose) in terms of risks and benefits. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials evaluating 'low-intensity' 'minidose' or 'low-dose anticoagulant' treatment for prevention of thromboembolic events in AF was conducted by two independent reviewers. Study quality was evaluated in a blinded fashion. Four original studies were retrieved. Outcome events were determined in various treatment groups: ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, thromboses (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism or myocardial infarction), vascular death, major hemorrhage and hemorrhagic death. Results obtained with a random effects model were expressed as a common relative risk. Adjusted-dose warfarin compared with lower dose warfarin (INR < or = 1.6) in 2108 randomised patients significantly reduced the risk of any thrombosis: Relative risk (RR): 0.50 (95% CI; 0.25 to 0.97). The RR was 0.46 (95%CI; 0.2 to 1.07) for ischemic stroke. Inversely lower dose did not statistically decrease the risk for major hemorrhage compared to adjusted-dose: RR adjusted-dose vs lower dose: 1.23 (95% CI; 0.67-2.27). The RR was 0.97 (95 % CI 0.27-3.54) for hemorrhagic death. Our meta-analysis showed that adjusted-dose compared with low-dose or minidose warfarin therapy (INR < or =1.6) was more effective to prevent ischemic thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14961170     DOI: 10.1160/TH03-08-0541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The standard is still the standard or why an INR of 2-3 is still the optimal intensity for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Quality of Life in elderly inpatients with atrial fibrillation as compared with controlled subjects.

Authors:  C Perret-Guillaume; S Briancon; D Wahl; F Guillemin; F Empereur
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  New oral anticoagulants: discussion on monitoring and adherence should start now!

Authors:  Hugo Ten Cate
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2013-06-28

5.  Prevention strategies for cardioembolic stroke: present and future perspectives.

Authors:  Giacomo Giacalone; Mohammed Abballa Abbas; Francesco Corea
Journal:  Open Neurol J       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 6.  Vitamin K antagonists: relative strengths and weaknesses vs. direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Andreas Zirlik; Christoph Bode
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.300

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.