Literature DB >> 14960677

Digital resistance and tendon strength during the first week after flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair in a canine model in vivo.

Chunfeng Zhao1, Peter C Amadio, Philippe Paillard, Tatsuro Tanaka, Mark E Zobitz, Dirk R Larson, Kai-Nan An.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After flexor tendon repair, the strength of the repair and the resistance to digital motion are important considerations in deciding when to initiate postoperative rehabilitation. Our objective was to assess these factors in a short-term in vivo canine model of flexor tendon repair.
METHODS: Forty-eight dogs were randomly allocated to four groups based on the duration of postoperative follow-up (one, three, five, or seven days). In each group, two flexor digitorum profundus tendons of one forepaw were exposed. One tendon (the repair tendon) was sharply transected and repaired with a modified Kessler suture, and the other one (the sham tendon) was simply exposed without laceration. The involved paw was immobilized until the animal was killed on the designated day. Three tendons from each dog, including the repair tendon, the sham tendon, and a control tendon from a corresponding normal digit on the contralateral side, were tested.
RESULTS: The mean peak total digital resistance force in the repair group was lowest at five days (p < 0.01 compared with seven days; p > 0.05 compared with one and three days). The mean peak force needed to overcome the internal gliding resistance between the repaired tendon and sheath was significantly higher than that in both the sham and control groups at all time-points (p < 0.001); however, this value was also smallest at five days. There was no significant difference in suture strength at any time-point (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: When we evaluated tendon-gliding and suture strength after flexor tendon repair, the least favorable ratio of repair strength to force needed to overcome the resistance to digital motion was noted on Day 7, whereas the best combination of tendon strength and low peak resistance force was noted on Day 5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14960677     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Biomechanical and Dimensional Measurements of the Pulvertaft Weave Versus the Cow-Hitch Technique.

Authors:  Nanette L A Vincken; Thomas M A S Lauwers; Rene R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-04-29

Review 2.  Friction of the gliding surface. Implications for tendon surgery and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  The quadriga effect revisited: designing a "safety incision" to prevent tendon repair rupture and gap formation in a canine model in vitro.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Jun Ikeda; Peter C Amadio; Kai-Nan An; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Effect of core suture technique and type on the gliding resistance during cyclic motion following flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tamami Moriya; Chunfeng Zhao; Toshihiko Yamashita; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Cell and Biologic-Based Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries.

Authors:  Stephen W Linderman; Richard H Gelberman; Stavros Thomopoulos; Hua Shen
Journal:  Oper Tech Orthop       Date:  2016-09

6.  Effects of lubricant and autologous bone marrow stromal cell augmentation on immobilized flexor tendon repairs.

Authors:  Chunfeng Zhao; Yasuhiro Ozasa; Haruhiko Shimura; Ramona L Reisdorf; Andrew R Thoreson; Gregory Jay; Steven L Moran; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Rehabilitation of the upper extremity following nerve and tendon reconstruction: when and how.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Rebecca L von der Heyde
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  The early inflammatory response after flexor tendon healing: a gene expression and histological analysis.

Authors:  Cionne N Manning; Necat Havlioglu; Elisa Knutsen; Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert; Matthew J Silva; Stavros Thomopoulos; Richard H Gelberman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Controlled-release kinetics and biologic activity of platelet-derived growth factor-BB for use in flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert; Rosalina Das; Richard H Gelberman; Fredrick Harwood; David Amiel; Stavros Thomopoulos
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  TGF-β1 Suppresses Plasmin and MMP Activity in Flexor Tendon Cells via PAI-1: Implications for Scarless Flexor Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Youssef M Farhat; Alaa A Al-Maliki; Anas Easa; Regis J O'Keefe; Edward M Schwarz; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.