BACKGROUND: Dignity is a complex concept and there is little empirical research to show how older people view dignity. This study, using qualitative methods, explored the concept of dignity from the older person's perspective. METHODS: 15 focus groups and two individual interviews were conducted in 12 different settings, with a total of 72 participants. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure a mix of socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender, age (65+) and level of fitness. Focus groups were audio-taped and transcribed. The method of constant comparison was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: There was strong evidence to suggest that dignity was salient to the concerns of older people. Dignity was seen as a multi-faceted concept: (i). dignity of identity (self-respect/esteem, integrity, trust); (ii). human rights (equality, choice); and (iii). autonomy (independence, control). Examples of dignity being jeopardised rather than being enhanced were given. A loss of self-esteem arose from being patronised, excluded from decision-making, and being treated as an 'object'. Lack of integrity in society meant that there was an inability to trust others and an increased vulnerability. Equality was an important issue but many felt that government policies did not support their rights. CONCLUSIONS: This work identifies the different ways dignity is conceptualised by older people. The evidence showed that person centred care for older people needs to be specifically related to communication, privacy, personal identity and feelings of vulnerability. It provides evidence for policy makers and professionals to tailor policies and practices to the needs of the older person.
BACKGROUND: Dignity is a complex concept and there is little empirical research to show how older people view dignity. This study, using qualitative methods, explored the concept of dignity from the older person's perspective. METHODS: 15 focus groups and two individual interviews were conducted in 12 different settings, with a total of 72 participants. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure a mix of socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender, age (65+) and level of fitness. Focus groups were audio-taped and transcribed. The method of constant comparison was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: There was strong evidence to suggest that dignity was salient to the concerns of older people. Dignity was seen as a multi-faceted concept: (i). dignity of identity (self-respect/esteem, integrity, trust); (ii). human rights (equality, choice); and (iii). autonomy (independence, control). Examples of dignity being jeopardised rather than being enhanced were given. A loss of self-esteem arose from being patronised, excluded from decision-making, and being treated as an 'object'. Lack of integrity in society meant that there was an inability to trust others and an increased vulnerability. Equality was an important issue but many felt that government policies did not support their rights. CONCLUSIONS: This work identifies the different ways dignity is conceptualised by older people. The evidence showed that person centred care for older people needs to be specifically related to communication, privacy, personal identity and feelings of vulnerability. It provides evidence for policy makers and professionals to tailor policies and practices to the needs of the older person.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health
Authors: Cynthia S Hofman; Peter Makai; Han Boter; Bianca M Buurman; Anton J de Craen; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Rogier Donders; René J F Melis Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Cynthia S Hofman; Jennifer E Lutomski; Han Boter; Bianca M Buurman; Anton J M de Craen; Rogier Donders; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Peter Makai; René J F Melis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Arthur G Money; Anita Atwal; Katherine L Young; Yasmin Day; Lesley Wilson; Kevin G Money Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 2.796