Literature DB >> 14960220

Does changing from mercury to electronic blood pressure measurement influence recorded blood pressure? An observational study.

Richard J McManus1, Jonathan Mant, Martyn R P Hull, F D Richard Hobbs.   

Abstract

Mercury sphygmomanometers have been commonly used in primary care to measure blood pressure but are associated with bias. Electronic blood pressure machines are being introduced in many practices and have anecdotally been associated with higher recorded blood pressure. This study examined recorded blood pressure in four practices before and after electronic blood pressure machine introduction. No consistent change in mean blood pressure was apparent following their introduction, but there was a large and significant fall in terminal digit preference suggesting improved precision of recording.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14960220      PMCID: PMC1314749     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based treatment of hypertension. Measurement of blood pressure: an evidence based review.

Authors:  F A McAlister; S E Straus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-14

2.  Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. Requires clinicians to demand better automated devices.

Authors:  E O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

3.  In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  J Ireland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

4.  Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175.

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 5.  Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  L Ramsay; B Williams; G Johnston; G MacGregor; L Poston; J Potter; N Poulter; G Russell
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Selective recording in blood pressure readings may increase subsequent mortality.

Authors:  D Wingfield; G K Freeman; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2002-09
  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Are these emergency department performance data real?

Authors:  T E Locker; S M Mason
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Creating a transdisciplinary research center to reduce cardiovascular health disparities in Baltimore, Maryland: lessons learned.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; L Ebony Boulware; Edgar R Miller; Sherita Hill Golden; Kathryn A Carson; Gary Noronha; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Debra L Roter; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Lee R Bone; David M Levine; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Jeanne Charleston; Miyong Kim; Nae-Yuh Wang; Hanan Aboumatar; Jennifer P Halbert; Patti L Ephraim; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Discordance in national estimates of hypertension among young adults.

Authors:  Quynh C Nguyen; Joyce W Tabor; Pamela P Entzel; Yan Lau; Chirayath Suchindran; Jon M Hussey; Carolyn T Halpern; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study.

Authors:  Pablo E Pérgola; Carole L White; John W Graves; Christopher S Coffey; Silvina B Tonarelli; Robert G Hart; Oscar R Benavente
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 5.  Determining which automatic digital blood pressure device performs adequately: a systematic review.

Authors:  Y Wan; C Heneghan; R Stevens; R J McManus; A Ward; R Perera; M Thompson; L Tarassenko; D Mant
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Zero end-digit preference in recorded blood pressure and its impact on classification of patients for pharmacologic management in primary care - PREDICT-CVD-6.

Authors:  Joanna Broad; Sue Wells; Roger Marshall; Rod Jackson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Digit Preference in Office Blood Pressure Measurements, United States 2015-2019.

Authors:  Kathryn E Foti; Lawrence J Appel; Kunihiro Matsushita; Josef Coresh; G Caleb Alexander; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Manual or automated sphygmomanometer? A historical cohort to quantify measurement bias in blood pressure recording.

Authors:  Arash A Nargesi; Zaniar Ghazizadeh; Mehrdad Larry; Afsaneh Morteza; Firuzeh Heidari; Firuzeh Asgarani; Alireza Esteghamati; Kazem Mohammad; Manouchehr Nakhjavani
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  The effects of weight gain after smoking cessation on atherogenic α1-antitrypsin-low-density lipoprotein.

Authors:  Maki Komiyama; Hiromichi Wada; Shuichi Ura; Hajime Yamakage; Noriko Satoh-Asahara; Sayaka Shimada; Masaharu Akao; Hiroshi Koyama; Koichi Kono; Akira Shimatsu; Yuko Takahashi; Koji Hasegawa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Time-dependent Changes of Atherosclerotic LDL Complexes after Smoking Cessation.

Authors:  Maki Komiyama; Sayaka Shimada; Hiromichi Wada; Hajime Yamakage; Noriko Satoh-Asahara; Akira Shimatsu; Masaharu Akao; Tatsuya Morimoto; Yuko Takahashi; Koji Hasegawa
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.