Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in Japan. Invasion and metastasis of HCC are frequently observed during the development of HCCs, and are regulated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). We have previously reported the strong expression of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, and cellular localization of the transcripts in HCCs [1]. But the mechanisms of invasion and metastasis of HCCs, and particularly the role of TIMPs are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the tissue concentration of the TIMP-1 and to study the potential involvement of TIMP-1 in the development of HCCs.
Methods
Patients and Tissue Preparation
A total of 60 HCC nodules that received curative surgical resection were studied. The nodules had received no pretreatment. Clinical backgrounds of the patients are shown in Table 1. The tissue was divided into HCC and non-neoplastic liver. Tissue samples (~100 mg) of HCC and non-neoplastic liver were homogenized in 150 microliters of 0.5 M Tris, 1.5 M NaCl, 50 mM CaCl2, 2 mM sodium azide, pH 7.6. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15000 – g for 15 min at 4 degrees C and the supernatant was stored at -80 degrees C until analysis.
Table 1
Characteristics of the Patients Investigated in this Study
n
Cases
58
HCC nodules
60
Age
46–75 (median 66)
Sex
Male
46
Female
12
Background
Chronic hepatitis
42
Liver cirrhosis
16
Viral infection
hepatitis B virus (HBV)
14
hepatitis C virus (HCV)
42
HBV and HCV
2
Serum AFP (ng/ml, mean – SD)
766 – 2935
Tumor size in diameter (mm, mean – SD)
31 – 21
Characteristics of the Patients Investigated in this Study
Assay for tissue TIMP-1 concentration
TIMP-1 concentration in the supernatant of tissue homogenate of HCC and non-neoplastic liver was measured by a Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay system, using a commercial assay kit (Fuji Chemical Co. Japan), which contains two kinds of monoclonal antibodies against bovineTIMP-1.
Statistics
Difference between the tissue TIMP-1 concentration of HCC and that of non-neoplastic liver was examined by Student's t test. The Mann-Whitney's U-test was performed to compare the relationship between tissue TIMP-1 concentration and clinicopathological features.
Results
Tissue TIMP-1 concentration
The TIMP-1 concentration in HCC was 520 – 602 (mean – SD) ng/mg protein, and was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than that in the corresponding non-neoplastic liver (114 – 212).
Correlation between tissue TIMP-1 concentration and pathological features
The TIMP-1 concentration in HCC was examined in the various conditions of HCC invasion; those include the differentiation grade, the presence or absence of capsular formation, the capsular invasion, and the vascular invasion. These results are shown in Table 2. The TIMP-1 concentration of HCC in poorly differentiated HCC was higher than that in well and moderately differentiated HCC (p < 0.01 and p < 0.02, respectively).
Table 2
TIMP-1 concentration and pathological features of HCCs
TIMP-1 concentration in
Category
n
HCC
NN
Differentiation grade
Well
12
177*
55
Moderate
42
254**
63
Poor
6
1020***
74
Capsular formation
present
48
228
63
absent
12
564
51
Capsular invasion
present
39
244
72
absent
9
211
45
Vascular invasion
present
13
867
63
absent
47
252
57
* vs ***: p < 0.01 ** vs ***: p < 0.02 TIMP-1 concentrations are expressed as median value. NN: non-neoplastic liver.
TIMP-1 concentration and pathological features of HCCs* vs ***: p < 0.01 ** vs ***: p < 0.02 TIMP-1 concentrations are expressed as median value. NN: non-neoplastic liver.
Correlation between tissue TIMP-1 concentration and clinical features
The TIMP-1 concentration in HCC was examined in the various conditions of clinical features, that include the age of the patients, the underlying liver (liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis), the type of viral infection (hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus), serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and tumor size. The TIMP-1 concentration in liver cirrhosis was higher than that in chronic hepatitis (p < 0.01).
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that tissue TIMP-1 concentration in HCCs was significantly higher than that in non-neoplastic liver and that the TIMP-1 concentration in poorly differentiated HCCs was significantly higher than that of well and moderately differentiated HCCs. We have previously reported by using in situ hybridization that the expression of TIMP-1 in HCCs was stronger than that in non-neoplastic liver [1]. The present study further confirms that TIMP-1 is up-regulated in HCCs not only in the transcription but also in the translation level. The primary biological function of TIMPs is the inhibition of MMPs. When the cancer invades the surrounding non-neoplastic tissue, MMPs may play a major role to degrade extracellular matrices. TIMPs play an important role in the regulation of the action of MMPs. But, it has been reported that tissue TIMP-1 concentration in gastric cancer was associated with various pathological factors, and patients with high tissue TIMP-1 concentration had poor prognosis in comparison to those with low TIMP-1 level [2]. The elevated TIMP-1 level was also associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer [3]. It is intriguing that the TIMP-1 concentration in poorly differentiated HCCs was significantly higher than that of well and moderately differentiated HCCs. Our previous studies on mRNA level have not shown the similar results to the present study on the protein level. Generally, the lower the differentiation grade of HCCs, the stronger potential of growth, invasion and metastasis. TIMP-1 has been reported to be a new cell-growth factor [4] and also an anti-angiogenic factor [5]. These lines of evidence may be associated with the reason why the TIMP-1 concentration in poorly differentiated HCCs was high. Further studies on the functional role of TIMPs in HCCs are needed.
Authors: S Ylisirniö; M Höyhtyä; R Mäkitaro; P Pääakkö; J Risteli; V L Kinnula; T Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; A Jukkola Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: H W Schnaper; D S Grant; W G Stetler-Stevenson; R Fridman; G D'Orazi; A N Murphy; R E Bird; M Hoythya; T R Fuerst; D L French Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: H Nakatsukasa; K Ashida; T Higashi; S Ohguchi; S Tsuboi; N Hino; K Nouso; Y Urabe; N Kinugasa; K Yoshida; S Uematsu; M Ishizaki; Y Kobayashi; T Tsuji Journal: Hepatology Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 17.425