| Literature DB >> 14960165 |
Katsuyuki Imai1, Mitsuru Sato, Takeya Sato, Naosuke Kojima, Mitsutaka Miura, Nobuyo Higashi, Da-Ren Wang, Shinsuke Suzuki, Haruki Senoo.
Abstract
To investigate whether or not hepatic stellate cells can form intercellular junctions with each other, we cultured human stellate cells (LI90) on different kinds of substrata. Intercellular junctions were detected between these cultured stellate cells by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The molecular components of the intercellular adhesive structures were identified by immunofluorescence microscopy. Immunofluorescence for cadherin and catenins was detected at the adhesion sites between the cultured stellate cells. Thus, the intercellular junctions were indicated to be adherens junctions at the molecular level. The junctions developed in the cultured stellate cells irrespective of the type of substratum. These data suggest that the junctional formation between the stellate cells occurs in vivo as well as in vitro.Entities:
Year: 2004 PMID: 14960165 PMCID: PMC2410236 DOI: 10.1186/1476-5926-2-S1-S13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comp Hepatol ISSN: 1476-5926
Figure 1Transmission electron micrographs of hepatic stellate cells cultured in non-coated polystyrene culture dishes (panel a, b), on type I collagen gel (panel c, d), or on Matrigel (panel e, f). Panel a: close cell-cell contacts are detected between the stellate cells in non-coated polystyrene dishes. Bar = 500 nm. Panel b: enlarged image of the part of panel "a" indicated by the rectangle. Thin filaments and intermediate filaments are indicated by small- and large-sized arrows, respectively. Bar = 100 nm. Panel c: transmission electron micrograph of the cultured stellate cells on type I collagen gel. Bar = 500 nm. Panel d: enlarged image of the part of panel "c" marked by the rectangle. Bar = 100 nm. Panel e: transmission electron micrograph of the stellate cells on Matrigel. Bar = 1 –m. Panel f: enlarged image of the part of panel "e" covered by the rectangle. Bar = 200 nm. The cultured cells were examined with a TEM as described under Materials and Methods.
Figure 2Immunofluorescence localization of pan-cadherin (panel a), alpha-catenin (panel b), and beta-catenin (panel c) in the LI90 cells cultured on glass-cover-slip in the bottom of culture dishes. Nuclei of the cultured cells were counterstained with propidium iodide (panel a–d). The cultured cells were examined with an LSM as described under Materials and Methods. Strong immunofluorescence for pan-cadherin was observed at the sites of intercellular contact (arrows in panel a) or peripheral portion of the cells. Immunofluorescence for alpha-catenin was observed in the cell processes (arrows in panel b). Immunofluorescence for beta-catenin was clearly observed as discontinuous dot-like labeling where the cultured cells overlapped one another (arrows in panel c). As a control, some cultured cells grown on glass-bottom dishes were prepared with omission of the primary antibodies from the staining procedure. In these control specimens, fluorescence of Alexa Fluor 488 was completely negative in the cultured cells, although fluorescence of propidium iodide was clearly observed in the nuclei of the cells (panel d). Bar = 100 –m.