Literature DB >> 14960007

Two different degrees of mandibular advancement with a dental appliance in treatment of patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

Ake Tegelberg1, Marie-Louise Walker-Engström, Olle Vestling, Bo Wilhelmsson.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2 different degrees of mandibular advancement, 50% vs. 75% of maximum protrusive capacity, on somnographic variables after 1 year of dental appliance treatment in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A further purpose was to compare the number of adverse events on the stomatognathic system. In a prospective study, 74 male patients were randomly allocated to receive a dental appliance with either 50% (38 patients) or 75% mandibular advancement (36 patients). After 1 year of treatment, 55 patients completed the follow-up. Somnography was performed to measure treatment effects before and 12 months post-treatment. The apnea, apnea/hypopnea, and oxygen desaturation indices decreased significantly in both groups after 1 year (P < 0.001); however, there were no differences between the groups. Normalization (apnea index < 5 and apnea/hypopnea index < 10) was observed in 79% in group 50 and in 73% in group 75. Few patients (< 5%) reported symptoms from the stomatognathic system except for headache (> once a week), which was reported in one-third of the patients. Headache was significantly more infrequent after 1 year of treatment in both groups (P < 0.001). No serious complications were observed except for 2 patients who reported a painful condition from the temporomandibular joint in either group. In conclusion, mandibular advancement with a dental appliance effectively reduces the sleep-breathing disorder measured as frequency of apneas, and a pronounced mandibular advancement did not show a greater improvement of the medical problem compared to less advancement for patients with mild to moderate OSA. On the basis of few adverse events in the stomatognathic system or other complications we can recommend dental appliance treatment and, for patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea, not starting treatment by more than 50% mandibular advancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14960007     DOI: 10.1080/00016350310007130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  18 in total

Review 1.  Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  J Lim; T J Lasserson; J Fleetham; J Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-01-25

2.  A randomized crossover study comparing two mandibular repositioning appliances for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Bradley Bishop; Ronald Verrett; Thomas Girvan
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 3.  Efficacy and comorbidity of oral appliances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea: a systematic review and preliminary results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Aarnoud Hoekema
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Mandibular advancement splint titration in obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  A J Campbell; G Reynolds; H Trengrove; A M Neill
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Effects of an oral appliance with different mandibular protrusion positions at a constant vertical dimension on obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ghizlane Aarab; Frank Lobbezoo; Hans L Hamburger; Machiel Naeije
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  The effectiveness of different mandibular advancement amounts in OSA patients: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Maria Lavinia Bartolucci; Francesco Bortolotti; Eugenia Raffaelli; Vincenzo D'Antò; Ambra Michelotti; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Side effects of boil and bite type oral appliance therapy in sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  Hiroko Tsuda; Fernanda R Almeida; Shin-ichi Masumi; Alan A Lowe
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  The effect of gradually increased mandibular advancement on the efficacy of an oral appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Yanyan Ma; Min Yu; Xuemei Gao
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 9.  Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: an update.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Olivier M Vanderveken; Hiroko Tsuda; Marie Marklund; Frederic Gagnadoux; Clete A Kushida; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 10.  Clinical Evidence in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea with Oral Appliances: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Rossi; Antonino Lo Giudice; Camilla Di Pardo; Alberto Teodoro Valentini; Francesca Marradi; Nicola Vanacore; Cristina Grippaudo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.