UNLABELLED: A prospective cohort study was conducted to explore the extent of congruence and to identify the determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death of terminally ill cancer patients. A total of 180 terminally ill cancer patients were enrolled (87% response rate) and 127 died during the one-year study period. Nearly 90% of the subjects preferred to die at home. One-third achieved their preference for place of death. The kappa value of congruence (kappa = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.17) indicated poor to slight agreement between the preferred and actual place death. Important determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients included rehospitalisation and receiving hospice home care during the final days of life, perceived ability for family to help achieve preferred place of death, and residence in New Haven County. CONCLUSIONS: This study directly confirms that the degree of congruence between the preferred and actual place death is unsatisfactory. Clinical interventions and health policies need to be developed to assist terminally ill cancer patients who may not be able to achieve their preference for place of end-of-life care and death.
UNLABELLED: A prospective cohort study was conducted to explore the extent of congruence and to identify the determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death of terminally ill cancerpatients. A total of 180 terminally ill cancerpatients were enrolled (87% response rate) and 127 died during the one-year study period. Nearly 90% of the subjects preferred to die at home. One-third achieved their preference for place of death. The kappa value of congruence (kappa = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.17) indicated poor to slight agreement between the preferred and actual place death. Important determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancerpatients included rehospitalisation and receiving hospice home care during the final days of life, perceived ability for family to help achieve preferred place of death, and residence in New Haven County. CONCLUSIONS: This study directly confirms that the degree of congruence between the preferred and actual place death is unsatisfactory. Clinical interventions and health policies need to be developed to assist terminally ill cancerpatients who may not be able to achieve their preference for place of end-of-life care and death.
Authors: Reginald Deschepper; Robert Vander Stichele; Jan L Bernheim; Els De Keyser; Greta Van Der Kelen; Freddy Mortier; Luc Deliens Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Debra Parker Oliver; Jessica Tappana; Karla T Washington; Abigail Rolbiecki; Kevin Craig; George Demiris; Collyn Schafer; Mumeenat Winjobi; Margaret F Clayton; Maija Reblin; Lee Ellington Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2019-10
Authors: Charmaine L Blanchard; Oluwatosin Ayeni; Daniel S O'Neil; Holly G Prigerson; Judith S Jacobson; Alfred I Neugut; Maureen Joffe; Keletso Mmoledi; Mpho Ratshikana-Moloko; Paul E Sackstein; Paul Ruff Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Veronica Dussel; Ulrika Kreicbergs; Joanne M Hilden; Jan Watterson; Caron Moore; Brian G Turner; Jane C Weeks; Joanne Wolfe Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Christoph H R Wiese; Utz E Bartels; Karolina Marczynska; David Ruppert; Bernhard M Graf; Gerd G Hanekop Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.603