Literature DB >> 1494271

Speaking rates, response time latencies, and interrupting behaviors of young stutterers, nonstutterers, and their mothers.

E M Kelly1, E G Conture.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the speaking rates, interrupting behaviors, and response time latencies (RTL) produced by stuttering and nonstuttering children and their mothers, and the relationship these three paralinguistic behaviors have to children's speech disfluencies. Subjects were 13 boys who stutter (mean age = 4:0) and their mothers and 13 nonstuttering boys (mean age = 4:0) and their mothers. No significant differences were found between the two groups of children or between the two groups of mothers for any of the three paralinguistic behaviors with the exception that the mothers of nonstuttering children exhibited significantly (p < 0.01) faster rates of speech than either group of children. A strong positive correlation (r = .84) was found between stuttering children's scores on the Stuttering Severity Instrument (Riley, 1980) and the durations of the overlapping portions of their mothers' interruptions (i.e., their simultalk). Findings of this study are taken to support a facilitative demands-capacities model of conversational interaction in which mothers adjust the demands of their speaking models in response to their children's demonstrated capacities for fluent speech production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1494271     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3506.1256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  12 in total

1.  Age-related changes to spectral voice characteristics affect judgments of prosodic, segmental, and talker attributes for child and adult speech.

Authors:  Laura C Dilley; Elizabeth A Wieland; Jessica L Gamache; J Devin McAuley; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Differences of articulation rate and utterance length in fluent and disfluent utterances of preschool children who stutter.

Authors:  HeeCheong Chon; Jean Sawyer; Nicoline G Ambrose
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  The effect of emotion on articulation rate in persistence and recovery of childhood stuttering.

Authors:  Aysu Erdemir; Tedra A Walden; Caswell M Jefferson; Dahye Choi; Robin M Jones
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Sentence Length on the Speech Motor Control of School-Age Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Evan R Usler; Bridget Walsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Articulation rate and its relationship to disfluency type, duration, and temperament in preschool children who stutter.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Rebecca N Throneburg; Mavis E Kulak Kayikci
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 6.  Language abilities of children who stutter: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Katerina Ntourou; Edward G Conture; Mark W Lipsey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Influences of rate, length, and complexity on speech disfluency in a single-speech sample in preschool children who stutter.

Authors:  Jean Sawyer; Heecheong Chon; Nicoline G Ambrose
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Increases in cognitive and linguistic processing primarily account for increases in speaking rate with age.

Authors:  Ignatius S B Nip; Jordan R Green
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-01-17

9.  Utterance rate and linguistic properties as determinants of lexical dysfluencies in children who stutter.

Authors:  P Howell; J Au-Yeung; L Pilgrim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Non-word reading, lexical retrieval and stuttering: comments on Packman, Onslow, Coombes and Goodwin (2001).

Authors:  James Au-Yeung; Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.