| Literature DB >> 1493711 |
Abstract
A comprehensive questionnaire to assess acceptability was sent to 106 participants (and their partners) in a study on the safety and effectiveness of the Femcap. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the method, and were also asked about complaints such as vaginal infections, urinary tract infections, or other irritation. Eighty-one percent of the study sample either returned the mailed questionnaires or completed telephone interviews. Results were encouraging in that none of the study subjects or their partners reported any discomfort, trauma, or interference in sexual spontaneity with the cap. Vaginal irritation and infections were infrequently reported. The feature best liked by most participants was the absence of hormones associated with the method; the feature least liked was removal of the device. The Femcap may be an acceptable alternative to currently available barrier contraceptive devices.Entities:
Keywords: Americas; Bacterial And Fungal Diseases; Barrier Methods; Cervical Cap; Contraception; Contraception Research; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Diseases; Family Planning; Fitting; Infections; Ingredients And Chemicals; Inorganic Chemicals; Insertion; Method Acceptability--determinants; New York; North America; Northern America; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sampling Studies; Silicon; Silicone; Spermicidal Contraceptive Agents; Studies; Surveys; Treatment; United States; Vaginal Abnormalities; Vaginal Barrier Methods; Vaginitis
Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1493711 DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90115-a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contraception ISSN: 0010-7824 Impact factor: 3.375