Literature DB >> 1493462

Successful treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic patients with liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome)--a report on 40 cases from a single centre.

R Chopra1, A Fielding, A H Goldstone.   

Abstract

The use of high-dose chemotherapy and the subsequent prolonged neutropenia in patients with haematological diseases has resulted in an increased incidence of fungal infections. The only drug with proven efficacy in the treatment of deep seated fungal infections or invasive aspergillosis is amphotericin B. Unfortunately, this drug has adverse side effects, most importantly dose dependent nephrotoxicity. Furthermore, some patients fail to show a response to amphotericin B. We have treated 40 patients undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy and or bone marrow transplantation for haematological diseases with liposomal amphotericin for proven or suspected fungal infections. All patients had failed treatment with conventional Amphotericin B. Fourteen patients received liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) due to progression of infection on conventional amphotericin B. Twenty six patients received liposomal amphotericin due to nephrotoxicity caused by conventional Amphotericin B. Nine patients had mycologically proven fungal infection and of these, 7 patients (78%) showed a complete response to liposomal amphotericin. Thirty one patients received liposomal amphotericin due to suspected fungal infection. Eleven of these 31 patients (35%) showed a complete clinical response to liposomal amphotericin. However in the patients with suspected fungal infections 14 patients had no response and 6 patients could not be evaluated for response to liposomal amphotericin. Overall, of the 18 patients showing a response to liposomal amphotericin, 15 patients had either recovered their neutrophil count (> 0.5 x 10(9)/l) or achieved remission from their underlying haematological disease. Recovery from fungal infection in this group of patients occurred when there was complete remission of underlying disease and recovery of neutrophil counts, when concurrently treated by liposomal amphotericin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1493462     DOI: 10.3109/10428199209061570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  5 in total

1.  In search of the amazing technicolour dream coat for amphotericin B.

Authors:  J Conly; S Shafran
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07

2.  Costs of antifungal prophylaxis after bone marrow transplantation. A model comparing oral fluconazole, liposomal amphotericin and oral polyenes as prophylaxis against oropharyngeal infections.

Authors:  A Stewart; R Powles; M Hewetson; J Antrum; C Richardson; J Mehta
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Liposomes as delivery systems in the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases.

Authors:  J J Bergers; T L ten Hagen; E W van Etten; I A Bakker-Woudenberg
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1995-01-27

Review 4.  Lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Less toxicity but at what economic cost?

Authors:  J Tollemar; O Ringdén
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Treatment of deep mycoses with liposomal amphotericin B.

Authors:  J Berenguer; P Muñoz; F Parras; V Fernández-Baca; T Hernández-Sampelayo; E Bouza
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.