Literature DB >> 1493365

Overview of genotoxic carcinogens and non-genotoxic carcinogens.

Y Hayashi1.   

Abstract

It is known that carcinogens designated on the basis of longterm animal test results are extremely diverse in character, both in terms of potencies and the mechanism of action, which leads to complexity in their assessment for cancer risk to humans. The classification of carcin0ogens into two categories, namely, genotoxic and non-genotoxic varieties has been proposed to give a longical foundation on which cancer risk assessment can be reasonably based. The term "genotoxic carcinogen" indicates a chemical capable of producing cancer by directly altering the genetic material of target cells, while "non-genotoxic carcinogen" represents a chemical capable of producing cancer by some secondary mechanism not related to direct gene damage. This classification has contributed to the exclusion of various rodent-specific carcinogens from the group of chemicals with potential cancer risk to humans. However, the term, "nongenotoxic carcinogen" tends to give the mistaken impression that carcinogens shown to be negative for mutagenicity in a series of test systems might be harmless to humans. It should be realized that clear-cut criteria for this classification have not been established because of insufficiencies in the available information concerning mechanisms of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Future scientific advances leading to elucidation of the subcellular mechanisms of carcinogenesis are necessary for establishment of the unified, more realistic and mechanism-based approach to cancer risk estimation form exposure to chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1493365     DOI: 10.1016/S0940-2993(11)80159-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0940-2993


  7 in total

1.  Moesin is a biomarker for the assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in mouse lymphoma.

Authors:  Yoen Jung Lee; In-Kwon Choi; Yhun Yhong Sheen; Sue Nie Park; Ho Jeong Kwon
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.034

2.  Prediction of Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Based on Genetic Profiles of Short Term Exposure Assays.

Authors:  Luis Orlando Pérez; Rolando González-José; Pilar Peral García
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2016-10-30

Review 3.  Animal Models: A Useful Tool to Unveil Metabolic Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Marina Serra; Amedeo Columbano; Andrea Perra; Marta Anna Kowalik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Aristolochic acid I promoted clonal expansion but did not induce hepatocellular carcinoma in adult rats.

Authors:  Yong-Zhen Liu; Heng-Lei Lu; Xin-Ming Qi; Guo-Zhen Xing; Xin Wang; Pan Yu; Lu Liu; Fang-Fang Yang; Xiao-Lan Ding; Ze-An Zhang; Zhong-Ping Deng; Li-Kun Gong; Jin Ren
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 7.169

5.  Simultaneous measurement of unscheduled and replicating DNA synthesis by means of a new cell culture insert DNA retention method: rapid induction of replicating DNA synthesis in response to genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  A Okumura; T Tanaka; H Mori
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1996-08

Review 6.  Thresholds of Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens.

Authors:  Takehiko Nohmi
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2018-10-15

7.  Differential responses on energy metabolic pathway reprogramming between genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens in rat liver cells.

Authors:  Yuko Ito; Kota Nakajima; Yasunori Masubuchi; Satomi Kikuchi; Fumiyo Saito; Yumi Akahori; Meilan Jin; Toshinori Yoshida; Makoto Shibutani
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 1.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.