| Literature DB >> 1492346 |
R Tong1.
Abstract
The purpose of this commentary on James Nelson's article [1] is to advocate introducing the ethics of care into the arena of gestational conflict. Too often the debate gets stalled in a maternal versus fetal rights headlock. Interventionists stress fetal over maternal rights: they believe education, post-birth prosecution or pre-birth seizure of pregnant women may be permissible. In contrast to interventionists, other philosophers stress that favoring fetal rights treats women like 'fetal containers'. I question whether we should really consider issues of moral/parental obligations to children in terms of rights. Rather, the language of care should guide moral conduct vis-a-vis children/fetuses. The particularity of each woman's story--the particulars of her human relationships--inform her story. An individual's ability to care is largely a function of whether community cares for her. We must care for others to enable them to care for themselves and their loved ones--born or unborn.Entities:
Keywords: Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1492346 DOI: 10.1007/bf02126699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theor Med ISSN: 0167-9902