Literature DB >> 1491853

The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: an investigation of beliefs in the causes and consequences of pain.

Lindsey C Edwards1, Shirley A Pearce, Lynn Turner-Stokes, Anthony Jones.   

Abstract

This paper reports the development and validation of the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ). This is a 20-item questionnaire covering beliefs about the cause and treatment of pain. It was administered to 294 subjects, comprising 100 chronic pain patients and 194 controls. An exploratory factor analysis revealed 2 factors accounting for 68.15% of the variance. From the final solution 2 scales were derived: the first called Organic Beliefs and the second Psychological Beliefs scale, comprising 8 and 4 items, respectively. The construct validity of the questionnaire was assessed in 2 ways. First, the responses of chronic pain patients and non-patient controls were compared: a significant difference (F(1,236) = 53.04, P < 0.0001) between these 2 groups emerged such that chronic pain patients were more likely to endorse the Organic Beliefs scale items, whereas non-patients were more likely to endorse the Psychological Beliefs scale items. Secondly, as predicted significant associations were observed between scores on the Organic Beliefs scale and scores on the Chance and Powerful Others scales of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC), and also between the Psychological Beliefs and Internal scales of the MHLC. No relationship, however, emerged between these scales and measures of pain intensity. The implications of these findings for the assessment and management of chronic pain patients, and in the understanding of the development of chronic pain, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1491853     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90209-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  30 in total

Review 1.  A review of assessment tools of illness representations: are these adapted for a work disability prevention context?

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Marie-Elise Labrecque; Suzy Ngomo; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-08-22

Review 2.  Expanding Targets for Intervention in Later Life Pain: What Role Can Patient Beliefs, Expectations, and Pleasant Activities Play?

Authors:  M Carrington Reid
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.076

3.  Development and mixed-methods evaluation of a pain assessment video training program for long-term care staff.

Authors:  Michelle M Gagnon; Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Jaime Williams
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Reduced cortical responses to noxious heat in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A K Jones; S W Derbyshire
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation to brazilian-portuguese and measurement properties.

Authors:  Roberto Costa Krug; J P Caneiro; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Ben Darlow; Marcelo Faria Silva; Jefferson Fagundes Loss
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A controlled investigation of continuing pain education for long-term care staff.

Authors:  Omeed O Ghandehari; Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Jaime Williams; Lilian Thorpe; Dennis P Alfano; Vanina Dal Bello-Haas; David C Malloy; Ronald R Martin; Omar Rahaman; Sandra M G Zwakhalen; R N Carleton; Paulette V Hunter; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 7.  Illness perceptions and work participation: a systematic review.

Authors:  J L Hoving; M van der Meer; A Y Volkova; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Evaluation of a multi-disciplinary back pain rehabilitation programme--individual and group perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew Baird; Lisa Worral; Cheryl Haslam; Roger Haslam
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Depression and somatisation influence the outcome of total hip replacement.

Authors:  Wolfgang Riediger; Stephan Doering; Martin Krismer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Recovery attributions: explicit endorsement of biomedical factors and implicit dominance of psycho-social factors.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Galit Peretz; Ronny Iss; Ravit Kiedan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.