Literature DB >> 1491252

Activity of monkey frontal eye field neurons projecting to oculomotor regions of the pons.

M A Segraves1.   

Abstract

1. This study identified neurons in the rhesus monkey's frontal eye field that projected to oculomotor regions of the pons and characterized the signals sent by these neurons from frontal eye field to pons. 2. In two behaving rhesus monkeys, frontal eye field neurons projecting to the pons were identified via antidromic excitation by a stimulating microelectrode whose tip was centered in or near the omnipause region of the pontine raphe. This stimulation site corresponded to the nucleus raphe interpositus (RIP). In addition, electrical stimulation of the frontal eye field was used to demonstrate the effects of frontal eye field input on neurons in the omnipause region and surrounding paramedian pontine reticular formation (PPRF). 3. Twenty-five corticopontine neurons were identified and characterized. Most frontal eye field neurons projecting to the pons were either movement neurons, firing in association with saccadic eye movements (48%), or foveal neurons responsive to visual stimulation of the fovea combined with activity related to fixation (28%). Corticopontine movement neurons fired before, during, and after saccades made within a restricted movement field. 4. The activity of identified corticopontine neurons was very similar to the activity of neurons antidromically excited from the superior colliculus where 59% had movement related activity, and 22% had foveal and fixation related activity. 5. High-intensity, short-duration electrical stimulation of the frontal eye field caused omnipause neurons to stop firing. The cessation in firing appeared to be immediate, within < or = 5 ms. The time that the omnipause neuron remained quiet depended on the intensity of the cortical stimulus and lasted up to 30 ms after a train of three stimulus pulses lasting a total of 6 ms at an intensity of 1,000 microA. Low-intensity, longer duration electrical stimuli (24 pulses, 75 microA, 70 ms) traditionally used to evoke saccades from the frontal eye field were also followed by a cessation in omnipause neuron firing, but only after a delay of approximately 30 ms. For these stimuli, the omnipause neuron resumed firing when the stimulus was turned off. 6. The same stimuli that caused omnipause neurons to stop firing excited burst neurons in the PPRF. The latency to excitation ranged from 4.2 to 9.8 ms, suggesting that there is at least one additional neuron between frontal eye field neurons and burst neurons in the PPRF. 7. The present study confirms and extends the results of previous work, with the use of retrograde and anterograde tracers, demonstrating direct projections from the frontal eye field to the pons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1491252     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.6.1967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  56 in total

1.  Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  S Everling; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The role of supplementary eye field in goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2015-02-23

4.  Segregated pathways carrying frontally derived top-down signals to visual areas MT and V4 in macaques.

Authors:  Taihei Ninomiya; Hiromasa Sawamura; Ken-Ichi Inoue; Masahiko Takada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modeling unidimensional categorization in monkeys.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Roger Ratcliff; Anil Cherian; Mark Segraves
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Incomplete suppression of distractor-related activity in the frontal eye field results in curved saccades.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Projections of somatosensory cortex and frontal eye fields onto incertotectal neurons in the cat.

Authors:  Eddie Perkins; Susan Warren; Rick C-S Lin; Paul J May
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2006-12

8.  Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; John T Serences; Barry Giesbrecht; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  A microcircuit model of the frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Jakob Heinzle; Klaus Hepp; Kevan A C Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Executive control of gaze by the frontal lobes.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Leanne Boucher
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.