Literature DB >> 1490530

Does the continuous use of bronchodilators mask the progression of asthma or chronic bronchitis?

C P van Schayck1, H Folgering, J J den Otter, P Tirimanna, C van Weel.   

Abstract

Recently, we published data of a 2 year randomized controlled study in which the effects of continuous versus symptomatic bronchodilator treatment in patients with moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis were investigated. The results showed that FEV1 decline in the continuously treated group was significantly larger than in the symptomatically treated group (72 versus 20 ml/year, P < 0.05). We reanalysed these data in order to investigate the hypothesis that the continuous use of bronchodilators may mask a rapid decline in lung function. Lung function decline was assessed by regression analysis of seven FEV1 measurements. Respiratory symptoms were assessed by means of the MRC questionnaire every 12 months, and they were also recorded by the patients in a weekly report. Of the participating patients 144 completed the study. Increased lung function decline in the continuously treated group was not reflected in a significant deterioration of the symptoms. Moreover, the decline in FEV1 showed no correlation at all with changes in respiratory symptoms in continuously treated patients (r = -0.03, P = 0.80), whereas in the symptomatically treated group, there was a better relation (r = -0.32, P = 0.003) to changes in respiratory symptoms. These results show that continuous bronchodilation may indeed mask the worsening of the disease. This lack of awareness of deterioration of the disease is probably caused by the continuous symptom relief of bronchodilators. It may be misleading to both patients and physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1490530     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/9.4.397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  6 in total

1.  Bronchodilators: wrong for the lung in the long run?

Authors:  C P van Schayck
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Do bronchodilators adversely affect the prognosis of bronchial hyperresponsiveness?

Authors:  C P van Schayck; C L van Herwaarden
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Underdiagnosis of asthma: is the doctor or the patient to blame? The DIMCA project.

Authors:  C P van Schayck; F M van Der Heijden; G van Den Boom; P R Tirimanna; C L van Herwaarden
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Oral vs inhaled asthma therapy. Pros, cons and combinations.

Authors:  L M Fabbri; M Piattella; G Caramori; A Ciaccia
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Assessing the quality of life of adults with chronic respiratory diseases in routine primary care: construction and first validation of the 10-Item Respiratory Illness Questionnaire-monitoring 10 (RIQ-MON10).

Authors:  J E Jacobs; A R Maillé; R P Akkermans; C van Weel; R P T M Grol
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Continuous and on demand use of bronchodilators in patients with non-steroid dependent asthma and chronic bronchitis: four-year follow-up randomized controlled study.

Authors:  C P van Schayck; E Dompeling; C L van Herwaarden; H Folgering; R P Akkermans; P J van den Broek; C van Weel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.