Literature DB >> 1489289

A comparison of peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation after chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide as a single agent in doses of 4 g/m2 or 7 g/m2 in patients with advanced cancer.

P A Rowlings1, J L Bayly, C M Rawling, C A Juttner, L B To.   

Abstract

We used cyclophosphamide at a dose of 7 g/m2 in patients with advanced cancer and compared the efficacy of this treatment to generate peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with the previously reported regimen of cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 in a similar group of patients. None of these patients received haemopoietic growth factors. Twenty-two patients received 7 g/m2 and 37 received 4 g/m2. PBSC were collected by apheresis after the leukocyte count recovered to 1.0 x 10(9)/L. The yield of colony forming unit-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM) was higher for the 7 g/m2 group with a median of 35 x 10(4)/kg versus 15 x 10(4)/kg body weight (BW) (p < 0.05) and higher mononuclear cell yield with medians of 4.2 x 10(8)/kg compared with 3.1 x 10(8)/kg BW (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving the minimum safe level of > 15 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg BW was higher in the 7 g/m2 cyclophosphamide group (82%) than the 4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide group (51%). The duration of significant neutropaenia was a median of 11 compared with nine days (p < 0.004) and all patients receiving 7 g/m2 required admission to hospital and intravenous antibiotic therapy compared with 44% in the 4 g/m2 group. There was one death during the period of neutropaenia after cyclophosphamide in each group. Nineteen per cent of patients required platelet transfusions after cyclophosphamide 7 g/m2 compared with 18% after 4 g/m2. We conclude that the 7 g/m2 cyclophosphamide gives a higher yield of haemopoietic progenitor cells than the 4 g/m2 but at increased clinical toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1489289     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1992.tb04867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Med        ISSN: 0004-8291


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical role of GM-CSF in neutrophil recovery in relation to health care parameters.

Authors:  L S Hofstra; E G de Vries; C A Uyl-de Groot; E Vellenga
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.

Authors:  M J Watts; S J Ings; D Leverett; A MacMillan; S Devereux; A H Goldstone; D C Linch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children.

Authors:  José Eugenio Vázquez Meraz; José Arellano-Galindo; Armando Martínez Avalos; Emma Mendoza-García; Elva Jiménez-Hernández
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.443

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.