Literature DB >> 1487346

Is range of motion of the hip and ankle joint related to running injuries? A case control study.

W van Mechelen1, H Hlobil, W P Zijlstra, M de Ridder, H C Kemper.   

Abstract

This study concerns a case-control study on the relation between range of motion (ROM) of the hip and ankle joints and running injuries. Sixteen male runners who had sustained a medically treated running injury during the year prior to the ROM measurements were matched for weekly running distance and age with sixteen male runners who had not sustained such an injury. All subjects were fit at the time of measurement. ROM was measured by standardized goniometry after a warm-up on a cycle-ergometer. Within non-injured subjects all goniometric measurements showed no significant (p > 0.05) differences between the left and right side of the body. Within injured subjects all goniometric measurements showed no significant (p > 0.05) differences between the injured and non-injured side of the body. Runners who had sustained a running injury showed a significant (p > 0.001) more restricted ROM of the hip joints (average ROM value 59.4 degrees +/- 8.0 degrees) in comparison to runners who had no been injured during the same period (average value ROM 68.1 degrees +/- 5.2 degrees). No such differences (p > 0.05) were found with regard to ankle ROM (average ROM value injured 12.8 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees and average ROM value non injured 14.0 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees). These findings suggest that ROM can be characterized as a more or less stable anthropometric trait.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1487346     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1024574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sports injury surveillance systems. 'One size fits all'?

Authors:  W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Prevention of injuries in long-distance runners.

Authors:  B W Jakobsen; K Krøner; S A Schmidt; A Kjeldsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Range of motion, muscle torque and training habits in runners with and without Achilles tendon problems.

Authors:  Y Haglund-Akerlind; E Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Study designs and potential biases in sports injury research. The case-control study.

Authors:  M Schootman; J W Powell; J C Torner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Reducing Impact Loading in Runners: A One-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Bradley J Bowser; Rebecca Fellin; Clare E Milner; Michael B Pohl; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Reproducibility of and sex differences in common orthopaedic ankle and foot tests in runners.

Authors:  Maarten P van der Worp; Anton de Wijer; J Bart Staal; Maria W G Nijhuis- van der Sanden
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.