Literature DB >> 1487336

Anaerobic and aerobic power in arms and legs of elite senior wrestlers.

C A Horswill1, J E Miller, J R Scott, C M Smith, G Welk, P Van Handel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to characterize anaerobic power and aerobic power (power at peak oxygen uptake, or peak VO2) of elite senior (post-collegiate) wrestlers. Subjects (n = 14) from the U.S. national senior freestyle and Greco Roman wrestling teams were evaluated at separate tests using cycle ergometry for peak VO2 of the arms, peak VO2 of the legs, arm anaerobic peak power, and leg anaerobic peak power. Power output at peak VO2 was recorded for each test and compared to the anaerobic power of the appropriate body segment. The results (mean +/- SD) showed that wrestlers produced 2.3 +/- 0.4 W.kg body weight-1 at arm peak VO2 (43.7 +/- 4.6 ml.kg body weight-1. min-1), 4.2 +/- 0.5 W.kg body weight-1 at leg peak VO2 (50.9 +/- 5.1 ml.kg body weight-1.min-1), arm PP of 7.7 +/- 1.0 W.kg body weight-1, and leg PP of 10.5 +/- 1.7 W.kg body weight-1. Comparing power output during anaerobic and aerobic tests, the subjects performed at 3.4 +/- 0.6 times their peak oxygen uptake during arm anaerobic ergometry, whereas leg anaerobic peak power was 2.7 +/- 0.4 times the power at peak oxygen uptake for the legs (p < 0.05 for difference between ratios).
CONCLUSION: relative to aerobic power, elite senior wrestlers may produce power anaerobically in the upper body at significantly higher levels than in the lower body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1487336     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1024564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  7 in total

1.  Aerobic power and peak power of elite America's Cup sailors.

Authors:  Vernon Neville; Matthew T G Pain; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The relationship between body composition and anaerobic performance of elite young wrestlers.

Authors:  Selma Arzu Vardar; Selin Tezel; Levent Oztürk; Oktay Kaya
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Physiological profiles of elite judo athletes.

Authors:  Emerson Franchini; Fabrício B Del Vecchio; Karin A Matsushigue; Guilherme G Artioli
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Physical fitness factors to predict male Olympic wrestling performance.

Authors:  Jesús García-Pallarés; José María López-Gullón; Xabier Muriel; Arturo Díaz; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Physical and physiological profiles of Malaysian dragon boat rowers.

Authors:  R Singh; H J Singh; R G Sirisinghe
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Alterations in energy system contribution following upper body sprint interval training.

Authors:  Michael B La Monica; David H Fukuda; Tristan M Starling-Smith; Nicolas W Clark; Valeria L G Panissa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region.

Authors:  Leonie Harvey; Matthew Bousson; Chris McLellan; Dale Lovell
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.193

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.