Literature DB >> 14872498

Minocycline is not effective in systemic sclerosis: results of an open-label multicenter trial.

Maureen D Mayes1, Daniel O'Donnell, Naomi F Rothfield, M E Csuka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if minocycline therapy improved skin thickness in early, diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc) by > or =30%, a level of improvement unlikely to occur in the natural history of the disease as determined by recent controlled trials.
METHODS: Subjects with diffuse SSc of < or =5 years' duration were treated with oral minocycline for 1 year. The primary outcome measure was the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS).
RESULTS: Of 36 subjects initially enrolled, 31 returned for at least 1 followup visit and were included in the analysis (modified intent-to-treat analysis). The group consisted of 23 women and 8 men, with a mean age of 51.7 years (range 26-82 years) and a mean disease duration of 23.5 months (range 6-60 months). The mean MRSS at entry was 22.7 (range 12-43), and at the final visit it was 18.6 (range 2-48). There was no statistically significant difference in the change in skin scores between the minocycline-treated subjects and subjects previously reported in the D-penicillamine (D-Pen) trial. In addition, when adjusted for disease duration, a comparison of MRSS in the minocycline trial subjects (including all subjects active at each time point) and the previously reported D-Pen trial subjects showed no difference and no treatment effect. Fourteen subjects did not complete all 12 months of treatment; 10 of them withdrew due to disease progression. Disease duration was significantly shorter for the noncompleters than for the completers (P < 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The degree of change in the MRSS was similar to that expected in the natural course of this disease. Based on these data, minocycline is not an effective therapy for SSc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14872498     DOI: 10.1002/art.20036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  8 in total

1.  Patterns and predictors of change in outcome measures in clinical trials in scleroderma: an individual patient meta-analysis of 629 subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  P A Merkel; N P Silliman; P J Clements; C P Denton; D E Furst; M D Mayes; J E Pope; R P Polisson; J B Streisand; J R Seibold
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-10

2.  Hyperpigmentation associated with minocycline therapy.

Authors:  Soumya Chatterjee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Scleroderma therapy: clinical overview of current trends and future perspective.

Authors:  Afsha A Topal; Rachita S Dhurat
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  A randomized unblinded trial of cyclophosphamide versus azathioprine in the treatment of systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  O Nadashkevich; P Davis; M Fritzler; W Kovalenko
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  [Systemic sclerosis. Objectives for the treatment].

Authors:  B Maurer; M Walder; R E Gay; S Gay; O Distler
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: an update on instruments and current research.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Peter A Merkel
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Clinical Treatment Options in Scleroderma: Recommendations and Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Jiali Wu; Haijing Wu; Amr H Sawalha; Qianjin Lu
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 8.  Animal models of systemic sclerosis: their utility and limitations.

Authors:  Carol M Artlett
Journal:  Open Access Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.