Literature DB >> 14872476

Once-weekly administration of 50 mg etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Edward C Keystone1, Michael H Schiff, Joel M Kremer, Shelly Kafka, Michael Lovy, Todd DeVries, Daniel J Burge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of 50 mg etanercept administered subcutaneously once weekly in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Four hundred twenty RA patients were randomized to receive, in a blinded manner, the study drug for up to 16 weeks: 214 patients received 50 mg etanercept once weekly, 153 received 25 mg etanercept twice weekly, and 53 received placebo for 8 weeks followed by 25 mg etanercept twice weekly for 8 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed at weeks 8 and 16. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on serum samples from patients at selected study sites. The primary efficacy end point was achievement of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria (ACR20 response) at week 8.
RESULTS: An ACR20 response was achieved at week 8 by 50% of the patients receiving 50 mg etanercept once weekly, by 49% of the patients receiving 25 mg etanercept twice weekly, and by 19% of the patients in the placebo group (P </= 0.0001 for each etanercept group versus placebo). Similarly, achievement of the ACR50 response was attained by 18% of patients in each of the 2 etanercept groups, compared with 6% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.03 for each comparison). Pharmacokinetics of the 2 etanercept regimens were similar at steady state. No clinically significant differences in efficacy or safety were observed between the 2 etanercept groups.
CONCLUSION: Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were comparable between the 2 etanercept dosing regimens. Thus, comparable clinical outcomes are to be expected when patients are treated with etanercept administered either as 50 mg once weekly or as 25 mg twice weekly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14872476     DOI: 10.1002/art.20019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  82 in total

1.  Long term safety of etanercept in elderly subjects with rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  R Fleischmann; S W Baumgartner; M H Weisman; T Liu; B White; P Peloso
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  [Modern antirheumatic pharmacotherapy. Low molecular weight substances vs. biologicals].

Authors:  J Sautner; B F Leeb
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Evidence of effectiveness: how much can we extrapolate from existing studies?

Authors:  Howard Lee; Dong-Seok Yim; Honghui Zhou; Carl C Peck
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Andrea Stancati; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered etanercept in subjects with psoriasis.

Authors:  Ivan Nestorov; Ralph Zitnik; Todd DeVries; Arline M Nakanishi; Andrea Wang; Christopher Banfield
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Effectiveness of a once weekly double dose of etanercept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a clinical study.

Authors:  Femke H M Prince; Marinka Twilt; Nelleke C J A Jansen-Wijngaarden; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  [Biologics for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Consensus statement of the 7th Wörlitzer Expertengespräche 2004 for the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie].

Authors:  G Horneff
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy over conventional therapy improves endothelial function in adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  William Bilsborough; Helen Keen; Andrew Taylor; Gerard J O'Driscoll; Leonard Arnolda; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  [Phase IV non-interventional studies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologicals in Germany : real-life clinical practice data].

Authors:  J Ruof; C Iking-Konert; S Simianer; G-R Burmester
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen S Hazlewood; Cheryl Barnabe; George Tomlinson; Deborah Marshall; Daniel J A Devoe; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.