Literature DB >> 14872248

Influence of ski pole grip on peak upper body power output in cross-country skiers.

D P Heil1, J Engen, B K Higginson.   

Abstract

This study tested the influence of three ski pole grip systems (pole grip + wrist strap) on peak upper body power output: a traditional system (Swix PC grip and simple strap); a modern system (Swix PC grip and SR94 strap); an integrated system (Yoko 232 grip and Yoko 232 strap). Nine men [mean (SD): 32 (12) years, 177.0 (5.4) cm, 75.1 (6.0) kg] and two women [24 (9) years, 174.6 (3.6) cm, 67.3 (7.7) kg], all of whom were experienced cross-country ski racers at the regional, national, or international level for the U.S., performed three successive upper body power (UBP) tests on a modified double-poling ergometer. Each subject performed three 15-s tests of UBP using stiff cross-country ski poles (classic length; same poles for all tests per subject) and a resistance corresponding to 3% of body mass. Peak UBP was determined as the highest 5-s average power output during the last 10 s of each test. The three grip systems were tested in a counterbalanced order with 3-3.5 min of rest between tests. Peak UBP data were analyzed using a two-factor RM ANOVA and Sheffe's post-hoc test at the 0.05 alpha level. Peak UBP for the integrated system [mean (SE): 169.2 (6.8) W or 2.30 (0.06) W/kg] was significantly higher than value for both the modern [164.1 (7.2) W or 2.23 (0.07) W/kg] and traditional systems [162.5 (7.0) W, or 2.21 (0.06) W/kg] for absolute and relative power output (P<0.05). Given that double-poling peak UBP can be influenced by the ski pole grip system, a skier's choice of grip system may also influence cross-country ski racing performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14872248     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0992-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  8 in total

1.  Upper body power comparison between groups of cross-country skiers and runners.

Authors:  S E Gaskill; R C Serfass; K W Rundell
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Influence of body mass on cross-country ski racing performance.

Authors:  U Bergh; A Forsberg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Technological advances in cross-country ski equipment.

Authors:  G M Street
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The influence of body mass in cross-country skiing.

Authors:  U Bergh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Treadmill roller ski test predicts biathlon roller ski race results of elite U.S. biathlon women.

Authors:  K W Rundell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Physiological characteristics and performance of top U.S. biathletes.

Authors:  K W Rundell; D W Bacharach
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The energy cost of cross-country skiing among elite competitors.

Authors:  J D MacDougall; R Hughson; J R Sutton; J R Moroz
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1979
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Upper body power as a determinant of classical cross-country ski performance.

Authors:  Nathan G Alsobrook; Daniel P Heil
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Upper limb isokinetic muscle strength predicts the performance in cross-country sit-skiing.

Authors:  Chenglin Liu; Yuan Tian; Longfeng Zhou; Zhulin Tian; Gang Sun; Jun Yin; Zhixiong Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.