Literature DB >> 14872084

Proceeding with clinical trials of animal to human organ transplantation: a way out of the dilemma.

A Ravelingien1, F Mortier, E Mortier, I Kerremans, J Braeckman.   

Abstract

The transplantation of porcine organs to humans could in the future be a solution to the worldwide organ shortage, but is to date still highly experimental. Further research on the potential effects of crossing the species barrier is essential before clinical application is acceptable. However, many crucial questions on efficacy and safety will ultimately only be answered by well designed and controlled solid organ xenotransplantation trials on humans. This paper is concerned with the question under which conditions, given the risks involved and the ethical issues raised, such clinical trials should be resumed. An alternative means of overcoming the safety and ethical issues is suggested: willed body donation for scientific research in the case of permanent vegetative status. This paper argues that conducting trials on such bodies with prior consent is preferable to the use of human subjects without lack of brain function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14872084      PMCID: PMC1757120          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.004325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  27 in total

1.  A requiem for whole brain death: a response to D. Alan Shewmon's 'the brain and somatic integration'.

Authors:  M Potts
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2001-10

2.  Infection in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  J A Fishman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

Review 3.  [Approach to the patient in vegetative state. Part III: prognosis].

Authors:  N Latronico; S Alongi; E Facchi; M Taricco; A Candiani
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. The XEN 111 Study Group.

Authors:  K Paradis; G Langford; Z Long; W Heneine; P Sandstrom; W M Switzer; L E Chapman; C Lockey; D Onions; E Otto
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Infection by porcine endogenous retrovirus after islet xenotransplantation in SCID mice.

Authors:  L J van der Laan; C Lockey; B C Griffeth; F S Frasier; C A Wilson; D E Onions; B J Hering; Z Long; E Otto; B E Torbett; D R Salomon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Patient and family attitudes regarding the practice of procedures on the newly deceased.

Authors:  C A Manifold; A Storrow; K Rodgers
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  No evidence for infection of human cells with porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) after exposure to porcine fetal neuronal cells.

Authors:  J H Dinsmore; C Manhart; R Raineri; D B Jacoby; A Moore
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Ethics seminars: the practice of medical procedures on newly dead patients--is consent warranted?

Authors:  G P Moore
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  No evidence of infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of porcine islet-cell xenografts.

Authors:  W Heneine; A Tibell; W M Switzer; P Sandstrom; G V Rosales; A Mathews; O Korsgren; L E Chapman; T M Folks; C G Groth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  No evidence of pig DNA or retroviral infection in patients with short-term extracorporeal connection to pig kidneys.

Authors:  C Patience; G S Patton; Y Takeuchi; R A Weiss; M O McClure; L Rydberg; M E Breimer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Living patients in a permanent vegetative state as legitimate research subjects.

Authors:  S Curry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Relatives of the living dead.

Authors:  J Thompson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Research and patients in a permanent vegetative state.

Authors:  H Draper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Respecting rights ... to death.

Authors:  N Levy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Right of the living dead? Consent to experimental surgery in the event of cortical death.

Authors:  R Sparrow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Xenotransplantation: a bioethical evaluation.

Authors:  M Anderson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Life and Health: A Value in Itself for Human Beings?

Authors:  Helen Watt
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2015-09

Review 8.  Islet Xeno/transplantation and the risk of contagion: local responses from Canada and Australia to an emerging global technoscience.

Authors:  Myra Cheng
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2015-10-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.