Literature DB >> 14871514

Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes.

B Kahana1, E Sheiner, A Levy, S Lazer, M Mazor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by umbilical cord prolapse.
METHODS: A population-based study was performed comparing all deliveries complicated by cord prolapse to deliveries without this complication. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Prolapse of the umbilical cord complicated 0.4% (n=456) of all deliveries included in the study (n=121,227). Independent risk factors for cord prolapse identified by a backward, stepwise multivariate logistic regression model were: malpresentation (OR=5.1; 95% CI 4.1-6.3), hydramnios (OR=3.0; 95% CI 2.3-3.9), true knot of the umbilical cord (OR=3.0; 95% CI 1.8-5.1), preterm delivery (OR=2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.8), induction of labor (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.7-2.8), grandmultiparity (>five deliveries, OR=1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.3), lack of prenatal care (OR=1.4; 95% CI 1.02-1.8), and male gender (OR=1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6). Newborns delivered after umbilical cord prolapse graded lower Apgar scores, less than 7, at 5 min (OR=11.9, 95% CI 7.9-17.9), and had longer hospitalizations (mean 5.4+/-3.5 days vs. 2.9+/-2.1 days; P<0.001). Moreover, higher rates of perinatal mortality were noted in the cord prolapse group vs. the control group (OR=6.4, 95% CI 4.5-9.0). Using a multiple logistic regression model controlling for possible confounders, such as preterm delivery, hydramnios, etc., umbilical cord prolapse was found to be an independent contributing factor to perinatal mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolapse of the umbilical cord is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14871514     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00333-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

1.  Impact of simulation training on decision to delivery interval in cord prolapse.

Authors:  Gillian Gallagher; Alison Griffin; Sharon Clipperton; Sarah Janssens
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2021-06-16

2.  The influence of health-seeking behavior on the incidence and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse in Nigeria.

Authors:  Christopher A Enakpene; Akin-Tunde O Odukogbe; Imran O Morhason-Bello; Akinyinka O Omigbodun; Ayo O Arowojolu
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

3.  Fetal demise and associated factors following umbilical cord prolapse in Mulago hospital, Uganda: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Esau Wangi Wasswa; Sarah Nakubulwa; Twaha Mutyaba
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  The use of balloons for uterine cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of umbilical cord prolapse: population based questionnaire survey in Japan.

Authors:  Junichi Hasegawa; Akihiko Sekizawa; Tomoaki Ikeda; Mitsuhiko Koresawa; Isamu Ishiwata; Masakiyo Kawabata; Katsuyuki Kinoshita
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  The incidence, risk factors and determinants of perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapses in Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Omololu Adegbola; Olufemi Ayanbode
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

6.  Relevant Obstetric Factors for Cerebral Palsy: From the Nationwide Obstetric Compensation System in Japan.

Authors:  Junichi Hasegawa; Satoshi Toyokawa; Tsuyomu Ikenoue; Yuri Asano; Shoji Satoh; Tomoaki Ikeda; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Nanako Tamiya; Akihito Nakai; Keiya Fujimori; Tsugio Maeda; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hideaki Suzuki; Shigeru Ueda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk Factors for Umbilical Cord Prolapse at the Time of Artificial Rupture of Membranes.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Chun-Chih Huang; Helain J Landy
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-05-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.