Literature DB >> 1486976

Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies.

J H Dennis1, A J Avery, E H Walters, D J Hendrick.   

Abstract

Standardized methods for the measurement of airway responsiveness may use the Mefar MB3 inhalation dosimeter to generate standard doses of methacholine aerosol. The manufacturer provides calibrated output data for every nebulizer, so that a standard output may be achieved by varying nebulization time. This output is, however, measured by weight loss (WL), which may over-estimate true aerosol output (AO) because of concomitant evaporation. We have used a chemical (fluoride) tracer method to measure AO directly from two batches of Mefar nebulizers (batch 1 n = 5, batch 2 n = 10) and compared results with manufacturer's quoted WL. Mean AO from batch 1 was 10.56 mg.s-1 (range 9.50-11.63, SD = 0.92 mg.s-1), and mean AO from batch 2 was 5.66 mg.s-1 (range 4.92-6.58, SD = 0.57 mg.s-1), implying that AO varied little within, but substantially between, the two nebulizer batches. Manufacturer's quoted WL does not reflect this near two fold difference: mean WL batch 1 = 14.0 mg.s-1 (range 13-15 mg.s-1); mean WL batch 2 = 11.1 mg.s-1 (range 11-12 mg.s-1). The median aerosol fractions (AO/WL) for batches 1 and 2 were 76% (range 65-83%) and 50% (range 43-60%), respectively. Similar results were obtained with our own measurement of weight loss. This implies that if the median nebulizers of batches 1 and 2 were calibrated (as recommended) by the manufacture's WL to deliver a presumed 100 micrograms methacholine dose, the actual doses delivered would be 76 micrograms and 50 micrograms, the range for all 15 nebulizers being 43-83 micrograms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1486976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  3 in total

Review 1.  Methodology of bronchial responsiveness.

Authors:  S Chinn
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Cough challenge in the assessment of cough reflex.

Authors:  A H Morice; J A Kastelik; R Thompson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Differences in aerosol output and airways responsiveness between the DeVilbiss 40 and 45 hand held nebulisers.

Authors:  C J Hartley-Sharpe; H Booth; D P Johns; E H Walters
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.