Literature DB >> 1486751

Adolescent osteoporosis disclosing familial osteopenia.

R Treves1, H Harang, P Bertin, C Bonnet, M Arnaud, R Desproges-Gotteron.   

Abstract

The observations of familial juvenile osteoporosis, presumably of genetic origin are exceptional. The authors report the observation of a 16-year old adolescent suffering from osteoporosis, confirmed by histomorphometry and decrease in bone density (lumbar vertebrae 0.79 g/cm2 and femoral neck 0.88 g/cm2: LUNAR DPX). We prescribed fluorine and calcium therapy. Lumbar bone density increases by 11% and bone density of the thighbone neck by 7.6%. We cannot rule out growth as a factor in the changes observed, given that the propositus is only 16. A densitometric investigation performed in 4 of his 12 brothers shows a decrease in the lumbar bone mineral content (from 61 to 94% expressed as Z score). A genotypic origin seems to be conceivable, especially since no other cause could be considered (endocrinal, alimentary...). On the other hand, there is no argument in favour of osteogenesis imperfecta disease. The bone densitometry is a useful diagnostic means to detect familial forms of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1486751     DOI: 10.1007/bf02283119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  [Normal values in children of bone mineral content measured by dual photon absorptiometry].

Authors:  F Tison; H Ythier; P Lecouffe; J Rousseau; X Marchandise
Journal:  Ann Pediatr (Paris)       Date:  1990-05

2.  Genetic determinants of bone mineral content at the spine and radius: a twin study.

Authors:  J Dequeker; J Nijs; A Verstraeten; P Geusens; G Gevers
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; J L Hopper; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Genetic factors in determining bone mass.

Authors:  D M Smith; W E Nance; K W Kang; J C Christian; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Seeman; J L Hopper; L A Bach; M E Cooper; E Parkinson; J McKay; G Jerums
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Bone mass is low in relatives of osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  R A Evans; G M Marel; E K Lancaster; S Kos; M Evans; S Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Comparative skeletal mass and radial bone mineral content in black and white women.

Authors:  S H Cohn; C Abesamis; S Yasumura; J F Aloia; I Zanzi; K J Ellis
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 8.694

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.