Literature DB >> 1486077

Localisation of corneal foreign bodies.

L G Kay-Wilson1.   

Abstract

Of 50 patients attending the eye casualty department with a corneal foreign body (FB), 41 were able to say where they felt the FB and 78% of these were localised correctly for side or level of cornea. Patient handedness did not influence FB location. Indicating the upper lid was a particularly poor guide to localisation, whereas FB sensations within the palpebral fissure, in the lower lid or medially or laterally were good guides to actual FB location. A simple method of recording FB location by zone and clock hour is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1486077      PMCID: PMC504395          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.76.12.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Experience in clinical examination of corneal sensitivity; corneal sensitivity and the naso-lacrimal reflex after retrobulbar anaesthesia.

Authors:  J BOBERG-ANS
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Removal of rust rings, comparing electric drill and hypodermic needle.

Authors:  H Sigurdsson; I Hanna; A J Lockwood; S Longstaff
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A decade of intraocular foreign bodies.

Authors:  S P Percival
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Corneal rust removal by electric drill. Clinical trial by comparison with manual removal.

Authors:  N Brown; R Clemett; R Grey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Pain and corneal foreign bodies.

Authors:  S Shah; A K Brahma; A Sabala; A Brown; V F Hillier
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.