Literature DB >> 1485161

Sources of variance in exposure to postural load on the back in occupational groups.

A Burdorf1.   

Abstract

The variability of exposure to postural load on the back was studied in five occupational groups. A random sample of workers in each group was observed for two periods of 30 min during a shift, their posture being classified every 20 s. The estimated percentage of time spent in trunk flexion and rotation formed the principal measures of exposure. The partitioning of the total variability of exposure showed that occupational group status was the principal source of variance. The between-group variance accounted for 47 and 72% of the total variability of exposure to trunk flexion and rotation, respectively. The corresponding percentages were 29 and 16% for the within-worker variance of trunk flexion and rotation and 24 and 12% for the between-worker variance. This type of analysis of the sources of exposure variability may help to establish appropriate measurement strategies for exposure to postural load on the back in epidemiologic studies on low-back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1485161     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  12 in total

Review 1.  Identification of determinants of exposure: consequences for measurement and control strategies.

Authors:  A Burdorf
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Work related musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic stressors in the South African workforce.

Authors:  G H Schierhout; J E Meyers; R S Bridger
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology.

Authors:  A J van der Beek; M H Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Load on the low back of teachers in nursery schools.

Authors:  S Kumagai; T Tabuchi; H Tainaka; K Miyajima; I Matsunaga; H Kosaka; K Andoh; A Seo
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Physical workload and the aging worker: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B C de Zwart; M H Frings-Dresen; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Long-term back problems and physical work exposures in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey.

Authors:  J P Liira; H S Shannon; L W Chambers; T A Haines
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Reliability of job-title based physical work exposures for the upper extremity: comparison to self-reported and observed exposure estimates.

Authors:  Bethany T Gardner; David A Lombardi; Ann Marie Dale; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley A Evanoff
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Accuracy and precision of variance components in occupational posture recordings: a simulation study of different data collection strategies.

Authors:  Per Liv; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Susanne Wulff Svendsen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Comparing upper arm and trunk kinematics between manufacturing workers performing predominantly cyclic and non-cyclic work tasks.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Xuanxuan Zhang; Howard Chen; Sean Gallagher; Nathan B Fethke
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.940

10.  Inter- and intra-rater agreement of static posture analysis using a mobile application.

Authors:  David M Boland; Eric V Neufeld; Jack Ruddell; Brett A Dolezal; Christopher B Cooper
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.