Literature DB >> 1483169

Methodological issues in using a polydiagnostic approach to define psychotic illness.

A E Farmer1, S Wessely, D Castle, P McGuffin.   

Abstract

Although a polydiagnostic approach to the definition of psychotic disorder provides many advantages to the researcher, there are also disadvantages. A comparison between several different sets of operational criteria using the OPCRIT computer program on a consecutive series of 397 psychotic subjects is described. The results show that although current diagnostic procedures are generally reliable, such approaches can still only supplement skilled clinical judgement, and there remain many pitfalls for the unwary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1483169     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.161.6.824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  7 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study identifies genetic variation in neurocan as a susceptibility factor for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Sven Cichon; Thomas W Mühleisen; Franziska A Degenhardt; Manuel Mattheisen; Xavier Miró; Jana Strohmaier; Michael Steffens; Christian Meesters; Stefan Herms; Moritz Weingarten; Lutz Priebe; Britta Haenisch; Michael Alexander; Jennifer Vollmer; René Breuer; Christine Schmäl; Peter Tessmann; Susanne Moebus; H-Erich Wichmann; Stefan Schreiber; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Susanne Lucae; Stéphane Jamain; Marion Leboyer; Frank Bellivier; Bruno Etain; Chantal Henry; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Simon Heath; Marian Hamshere; Michael C O'Donovan; Michael J Owen; Nick Craddock; Markus Schwarz; Helmut Vedder; Jutta Kammerer-Ciernioch; Andreas Reif; Johanna Sasse; Michael Bauer; Martin Hautzinger; Adam Wright; Philip B Mitchell; Peter R Schofield; Grant W Montgomery; Sarah E Medland; Scott D Gordon; Nicholas G Martin; Omar Gustafsson; Ole Andreassen; Srdjan Djurovic; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Stacy Steinberg; Hreinn Stefansson; Kari Stefansson; Lejla Kapur-Pojskic; Liliana Oruc; Fabio Rivas; Fermín Mayoral; Alexander Chuchalin; Gulja Babadjanova; Alexander S Tiganov; Galina Pantelejeva; Lilia I Abramova; Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu; Carmen C Diaconu; Piotr M Czerski; Joanna Hauser; Andreas Zimmer; Mark Lathrop; Thomas G Schulze; Thomas F Wienker; Johannes Schumacher; Wolfgang Maier; Peter Propping; Marcella Rietschel; Markus M Nöthen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Anticipation in Swedish families with bipolar affective disorder.

Authors:  P O Nylander; C Engström; J Chotai; J Wahlström; R Adolfsson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Comorbidity of severe psychotic disorders with measures of substance use.

Authors:  Sarah M Hartz; Carlos N Pato; Helena Medeiros; Patricia Cavazos-Rehg; Janet L Sobell; James A Knowles; Laura J Bierut; Michele T Pato
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 4.  Competing definitions of schizophrenia: what can be learned from polydiagnostic studies?

Authors:  Lennart B Jansson; Josef Parnas
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Accuracy of diagnosis of psychosis on general practice computer system.

Authors:  I Nazareth; M King; A Haines; L Rangel; S Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-03

Review 6.  Biological, life course, and cross-cultural studies all point toward the value of dimensional and developmental ratings in the classification of psychosis.

Authors:  Rina Dutta; Talya Greene; Jean Addington; Kwame McKenzie; Michael Phillips; Robin M Murray
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 7.  A review of the reliability and validity of OPCRIT in relation to its use for the routine clinical assessment of mental health patients.

Authors:  Philip J Brittain; Daniel Stahl; James Rucker; Jamie Kawadler; Gunter Schumann
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.035

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.