Literature DB >> 1482905

The clinical utility of META: an analysis for hypertension.

J R Campbell1, G A Kallenberg, R C Sherrick.   

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical completeness of the National Library of Medicine Metathesaurus(META), we coded the conceptual information found in 2000 problem oriented (SOAP) notes for hypertension from one COSTAR site. To minimize the effects of practice idiosyncracy, we analyzed an additional 500 notes from a second, geographically remote site. Concepts occurring at either site numbered 1337. We classified concepts occurring at both sites as core concepts and these numbered 121. We attempted to find a matching concept of the proper semantic type in META for each of the items. All matching was done by program with a manual review by a physician. The overall success rate for matching was: [table: see text] We observed the greatest frequency of unmatched concepts in physical examination, medications, symptoms, personal behavior, non-medical therapies and counselling. We conclude that the current release of META is not sufficiently rich to describe the process of care in the ambulatory management of hypertension. However, the construction and breadth of the current scheme holds promise for medical knowledge representation and translation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1482905      PMCID: PMC2248117     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  1 in total

1.  Assessing and enhancing the value of the UMLS Knowledge Sources.

Authors:  B L Humphreys; D A Lindberg; W T Hole
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991
  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  A UMLS-based knowledge acquisition tool for rule-based clinical decision support system development.

Authors:  S L Achour; M Dojat; C Rieux; P Bierling; E Lepage
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The contributions of biomedical informatics to the fight against bioterrorism.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The basis for using the Internet to support the information needs of primary care.

Authors:  E E Westberg; R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Evaluation of the Unified Medical Language System as a medical knowledge source.

Authors:  O Bodenreider; A Burgun; G Botti; M Fieschi; P Le Beux; F Kohler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Building national electronic medical record systems via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  I S Kohane; P Greenspun; J Fackler; C Cimino; P Szolovits
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The content coverage of clinical classifications. For The Computer-Based Patient Record Institute's Work Group on Codes & Structures.

Authors:  C G Chute; S P Cohn; K E Campbell; D E Oliver; J R Campbell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity. CPRI Work Group on Codes and Structures.

Authors:  J R Campbell; P Carpenter; C Sneiderman; S Cohn; C G Chute; J Warren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Categorization of free-text problem lists: an effective method of capturing clinical data.

Authors:  J Zelingher; D M Rind; E Caraballo; M S Tuttle; N E Olson; C Safran
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

9.  A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists.

Authors:  J R Campbell; T H Payne
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

10.  Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record?

Authors:  S B Henry; W L Holzemer; C A Reilly; K E Campbell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.