Literature DB >> 1482871

The Columbia Registry of Controlled Clinical Computer Trials.

E A Balas1, J A Mitchell, K Bopp, G D Brown, B T Ewigman.   

Abstract

Numerous reports on randomized controlled clinical trials of computer-based interventions have been published. These trials provide useful evaluations of the impact of information technology on patient care. Unfortunately, several obstacles make access to the trial reports difficult. Barriers include the large variety of publications in which reports may appear, non-standard descriptors, and incomplete indexing. Some analyzers indicate inadequate testing of computer methods. The purpose of establishing a registry of randomized controlled clinical computer trials was to assist the identification of computer services with demonstrated ability to improve the process or outcome of patient care. A report collection, selection, information extraction, and registration method was developed and implemented. One hundred and six reports on computer trials have been collected. A large variety of computer-assisted interventions have been tested in the registered trials (40% reminder, 15% feedback, 14% dose planning, 14% patient education, 12% medical record). 76% of the registered reports were published in the United States and most of the remainder in various European countries. In reporting computer trial results, 77% of the authors did not use both the "computer" and "trial" keywords in the title or abstract of their papers. We conclude that a major obstacle to adequate computer technology assessment is inadequate access to the published results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1482871      PMCID: PMC2248150     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  10 in total

1.  Bias against the null hypothesis: the reproductive hazards of cocaine.

Authors:  G Koren; K Graham; H Shear; T Einarson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Computer predictions of abnormal test results. Effects on outpatient testing.

Authors:  W M Tierney; C J McDonald; S L Hui; D K Martin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Clinical utility of a Bayesian dosing program for phenytoin.

Authors:  M D Privitera; R W Homan; T M Ludden; C C Peck; M R Vasko
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal.

Authors:  R B Haynes; C J Walker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-07

5.  Computer-assisted digoxin therapy.

Authors:  C C Peck; L B Sheiner; C M Martin; D T Combs; K L Melmon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A proposal for registering clinical trials.

Authors:  S Piantadosi; D P Byar
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1988-03

7.  Application of a computerized medical decision-making process to the problem of digoxin intoxication.

Authors:  K S White; A Lindsay; T A Pryor; W F Brown; K Walsh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Randomized trial of computer-assisted insulin delivery in patients with type I diabetes beginning pump therapy.

Authors:  C M Peterson; L Jovanovic; L H Chanoch
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Vaccination of high-risk patients for influenza. A comparison of telephone and mail reminder methods.

Authors:  R Brimberry
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Evaluation of a computer based education lesson for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S L Wetstone; T J Sheehan; R G Votaw; M G Peterson; N Rothfield
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.666

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.