Literature DB >> 1481814

Fetal ultrasound abnormalities: correlation with fetal karyotype, autopsy findings, and postnatal outcome--five-year prospective study.

R D Wilson1, D Chitayat, B C McGillivray.   

Abstract

A 5-year prospective prenatal study in 151 pregnancies with 152 malformed fetuses detected by ultrasound was evaluated cytogenetically. Thirty-five fetuses (23%) had abnormal karyotypes. Specific anatomical fetal malformations identified by ultrasound increase the risk for fetal chromosome abnormalities. Risks of abnormal chromosomes in the fetus are present with both single and multiple anomalies including amniotic fluid volume although the risk is increased with specific anatomical systems and multiple malformations. An abnormal fetal karyotype was present in 17% with a single anatomical abnormality and 30% when two or more anatomical systems were involved. Fetal hydrops, duodenal atresia, and omphalocele were the most specific single ultrasound anomalies; fetal hydrops, IUGR, holoprosencephaly, congenital heart disease, diaphragmatic hernia, duodenal atresia, and omphalocele were the most specific multiple anomalies with abnormal amniotic fluid volume. Termination of pregnancy occurred in 32/58 patients diagnosed prior to the 20th week of pregnancy with most (31/32) having a chromosomal anomaly or severe fetal anomaly. Fetuses terminated after the 20th week had chromosomal (7/18) or lethal fetal anomalies (11/18). The most common aneuploidies were trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and 45,X. The decision to terminate the pregnancy was based in most cases on the fetal ultrasound findings. Correlation of ultrasound and clinical findings is important for accurate genetic counselling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1481814     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320440511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  6 in total

1.  Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype.

Authors:  Linda Kleeman; Diana W Bianchi; Lisa G Shaffer; Emily Rorem; Janet Cowan; Sabrina D Craigo; Hocine Tighiouart; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  P T Dick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Amelia L M Sutton; Ryan E Longman; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Rapid-prenatal diagnosis through fluorescence in situ hybridization for preventing aneuploidy related birth defects.

Authors:  Ashish Fauzdar; Mohit Chowdhry; R N Makroo; Manoj Mishra; Priyanka Srivastava; Richa Tyagi; Preeti Bhadauria; Anita Kaul
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01

5.  Uniparental disomy and prenatal phenotype: Two case reports and review.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Yan Liu; Song Yue; Li Wang; Tiejuan Zhang; Cuixia Guo; Wenjie Hu; Karl-Oliver Kagan; Qingqing Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients' Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result.

Authors:  Forum T Shah; Kathryn Steinhaus French; Kathryn E Osann; Maureen Bocian; Marilyn C Jones; Lauren Korty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.